Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Weird homes

Home is where the heart is, no matter what unusual form that home may take.  Slideshow 

Photo

The drone wars

The frontlines of America's covert drone program.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

U.S., Arabs reach deal at nuclear treaty talks

UNITED NATIONS | Fri May 28, 2010 12:13pm EDT

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - The United States and Egypt struck a deal on a push to pressure Israel to ultimately scrap any atomic bombs it has in a bid to avert a collapse of talks on shoring up the global anti-nuclear arms pact, envoys said Friday.

But they said it was unclear whether Iran would attempt to single-handedly block an agreement on a final declaration that has now been agreed upon by the other 189 signatories of the 1970 nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, who have been meeting for a month to find ways to strengthen the troubled pact.

"We have a deal that everyone can live with," a Western diplomat told Reuters. "Now the question is will Iran do the right thing."

The latest draft of a final declaration for the NPT review conference calls for U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon to organize a meeting of all Middle Eastern states in 2012 on how to make the region free of nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction, as demanded by a 1995 NPT resolution.

It also urges Israel to sign the NPT and put its nuclear facilities under U.N. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) safeguards -- a passage the Americans had wanted deleted. In the end, they backed down in the interest of salvaging the conference, delegates told Reuters.

The creation of a WMD-free zone would eventually force Israel to abandon any atomic bombs it might have. The Jewish state, which like nuclear-armed India and Pakistan never signed the NPT, is presumed to have a sizable nuclear arsenal but neither confirms nor denies that.

Israel is not participating in the NPT meeting.

(Reporting by Louis Charbonneau; editing by Todd Eastham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (13)
Apathy wrote:
How moronic… other countries deciding the fate of another… What a crazy world we live in. Apparently the tipping point is not yet here..

May 28, 2010 12:54pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
museumpiece wrote:
There are enough sophiticated newer types of high explosives available now so as to make the use of nuclear tipped weapons unnecessary. Maybe it’s time to recognize it really is time to leave the nuclear age behind us.

May 28, 2010 12:58pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Mikej77 wrote:
Iran wants nuclear weapons to establish itself as the regional superpower controlling the oil zone.
Treaties have nothing to do with this and Israel has little to do with it.
If Israel surrendered tomorrow Iran would still seek nukes. Iran will claim the “right” to rule the area on the basis of being the only power competent to destroy Israel after 60+ years.
Destruction of Israel is the means not the end for Iran.
Saudi Arabia will be the host for the Sunni/Arab Oil Nukes to balance Iran.
War is essential to the Iranian strategy as they are reaching the apex of their attack power. If there is no war they will collapse like the USSR. Germany in 1939 had a strategy of conquest and would also have collapsed had there been no war. Similarly, real total war is a desperate gamble by a declining power. Iran can accept permanent eclipse or wager on war.

May 28, 2010 1:39pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.