U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

Gates tells U.S. troops: no gay ban repeal imminent

Related Topics

Participants carry a large rainbow flag towards the U.S. Capitol during a gay rights demonstration in Washington October 11, 2009. REUTERS/Molly Riley

Participants carry a large rainbow flag towards the U.S. Capitol during a gay rights demonstration in Washington October 11, 2009.

Credit: Reuters/Molly Riley

WASHINGTON | Fri May 28, 2010 5:57pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Defense Secretary Robert Gates sought on Friday to ease concerns among U.S. troops about plans advancing in Congress to end the military's ban on homosexuals, saying a long, careful review process lay ahead.

Gates, in his first major address to U.S. troops on the politically charged legislation, said he did not expect Congress to pass the repeal for months, perhaps not until the end of the year.

Even then, the U.S. military would have to give final approval and would not do so without a comprehensive review that included troops' input and a cautious plan for implementation.

"Every man and woman in uniform is a vitally important part of this review. We need to hear from you and your families so that we can make these judgments in the most informed and effective manner," Gates said.

"So please let us know how to do this right."

The House of Representatives on Thursday approved an amendment aimed at ending the Clinton-era "don't ask, don't tell" policy, which allows homosexuals to serve if they keep quiet about their sexual orientation but expels them if it becomes known. More legislative hurdles remain.

Recent polls show most Americans support repealing the 1993 ban, as does President Barack Obama.

But opponents, including some within the military, question changing the policy during wartime, arguing it would put added strain on troops stretched by wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

The top U.S. military officer, Admiral Mike Mullen, a proponent of repeal, acknowledged the military is divided on the issue. "I've seen resistance. But I've also seen support," Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told National Public Radio later in the day.

TIMING UNCLEAR

Mullen expressed confidence the U.S. armed forces would eventually be able to incorporate openly serving homosexuals, but left the timing open.

"I have a great deal of confidence in our forces for lots of reasons and I think at some point in time, we'll be ready to do it," he said.

Opposition Republicans, gearing up for congressional elections in November in which they are expected to make gains, are rallying around the issue. They have accused Obama of pandering to gay rights advocates and ignoring the pressures on troops.

Gates asked troops to stay focused on the war effort and not the rhetoric in Washington.

"Do not let the on-going political debate distract you from what is important -- our critical mission to defend our country and our duty to uphold the values represented by the uniform you wear," he said, in an address aired on TV by the Pentagon.

Republican Senator John McCain, Obama's opponent in the 2008 election, has spoken out against the repeal. He points to letters from the heads of the U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines saying they wanted Congress to wait until the Pentagon completed its internal review before acting.

Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin noted the Pentagon still had a big say in the process and would need to change its internal regulations to implement the repeal.

"It's still up to them," he said.

(Additional reporting by Susan Cornwell, editing by Alan Elsner and Todd Eastham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (73)
jollypants wrote:
The Armed Services Committee vote was 16-12 exactly along party lines …

FOR HOMOSEXUALS IN THE MILITARY:

Carl Levin (Michigan)
Robert C. Byrd (West Virginia)
Joseph I. Lieberman (Connecticut)
Jack Reed (Rhode Island)
Daniel K. Akaka (Hawaii)
Bill Nelson (Florida)
Ben Nelson (Nebraska)
Evan Bayh (Indiana)
Jim Webb (Virginia)
Claire McCaskill (Missouri)
Mark Udall (Colorado)
Kay R. Hagan (North Carolina)
Mark Begich (Alaska)
Roland W. Burris (Illinois)
Jeff Bingaman (New Mexico)
Edward E. Kaufman (Delaware)

AGAINST HOMOSEXUALS IN THE MILITARY:

John McCain (Arizona)
James M. Inhofe (Oklahoma)
Jeff Sessions (Alabama)
Saxby Chambliss (Georgia)
Lindsey Graham (South Carolina)
John Thune (South Dakota)
Roger F. Wicker (Mississippi)
George S. LeMieux (Florida)
Scott Brown (Massachusetts)
Richard Burr (North Carolina)
David Vitter (Louisiana)
Susan M. Collins (Maine)

The DEMOCRATS now intend to ram their bill through Congress by appending it to the huge Defense Appropriation Bill that funds our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. That way, blue dog democrats who would otherwise vote against this will not be able to without cutting off funds to our troops. Now how is that for corruption?

REMEMBER IN NOVEMBER

May 27, 2010 9:09pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
LolaF wrote:
From my own experience in the Army, gay soldiers always kept their uniforms sharp and their bodies in peak physical condition. They were professional and compassionate. They were good soldiers. These are the kind of people I want representing our country to the world. The drunken frat-boy approach to soldiering has caused a lot of problems for the US. The military should not be a haven for dangerous bigots.

May 27, 2010 11:01pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
25 years in the military, two deployments, and I never cared what orientation troops were as long as they performed their mission. I’m somewhat to the right of Ghengis Khan politically.

This is not a political issue, it’s a bigotry issue.

May 27, 2010 12:56am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.