Sponsored Links

UPDATE 3-US has launched criminal probe into BP spill

Tue Jun 1, 2010 6:13pm EDT

* Looking at violations of several environmental laws

* BP shares move lower after confirmation of probe

* Not the first time BP has been in Justice Dept sights

(Adds BP comment, background on Exxon Valdez)

By Ed Stoddard

NEW ORLEANS, June 1 (Reuters) - The U.S. government has launched a widely expected criminal and civil investigation into BP Plc's (BP.L) massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder said on Tuesday, ratcheting up pressure on the beleaguered British oil company.

"We have begun both a criminal as well as a civil investigation as is our obligation under the law," Holder told reporters after meeting with state and federal prosecutors in New Orleans. "Our environmental laws are very clear."

Federal agencies, including the FBI, are participating in the probe and "if we find evidence of illegal behavior, we will be forceful in our response," he said, adding that prosecutors had a "sufficient basis" to start a criminal probe.

"BP will cooperate with any inquiry that the Department of Justice undertakes, just as we are doing in response to the other inquiries that already are ongoing," the company said in a statement.

During his first visit to the disaster site where he took a a tour of the spill, Holder said he saw "oil for miles and miles, oil that we know has already affected plant and animal life along the coast."

Confirmation of the probe, which Holder said started "some weeks ago," sent BP's shares down further after already getting hammered most of Tuesday. The stock plunged 15 percent, or $6.43, to close at $36.52 at the end regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange.

PRESSURE GROWING

Pressure has been building on BP and the Obama administration to stop the spewing oil, now in its 43rd day and no end in sight. Legal experts had predicted that it was only a matter of time before a criminal and civil probe would begin.

Holder declined to say who were the targets of the investigation, but the Justice Department has already demanded that at least three companies involved in the spill, BP, Transocean Ltd RIGN.S (RIG.N) and Halliburton Co (HAL.N), preserve their records related to the accident.

The Justice Department will look for violations of the Clean Water Act, the Endangered Species Act, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, which can be used to hold them liable for cleanup costs and reimbursement for government efforts [nN01133693].

Additionally, Holder said that "nothing is off the table at this point" with regard to the range of charges prosecutors could pursue, including traditional criminal charges if they find false statements were made.

"As our review expands in the days ahead, we will be meticulous, we will be comprehensive, and we will be aggressive," Holder told reporters. "We will not rest until justice is done."

However, he did acknowledge that the government's first priority was to stop the gushing well and clean up the oil.

The April 20 explosion aboard the Transocean Deepwater Horizon rig killed 11 workers and injured 17 others. Holder said that there could also be charges related to the "untimely and tragic deaths of those 11 rig workers."

This is not the first time BP has been in the Justice Department's sights. In October 2007 the company agreed to pay more than $370 million in fines and restitution to resolve several environmental and fraud allegations including criminal charges.

Those included a deadly explosion at a Texas refinery in 2005, pipeline leaks at the Prudhoe Bay field in Alaska in 2006, and an attempt to corner the U.S. propane market in 2004.

After the 1989 Exxon Valdez spill, Exxon Mobil in 1991 paid just over $1 billion in penalties and damages to settle criminal and civil charges brought by the Justice Department.

The U.S. government and State of Alaska sought another $92 million for restoration efforts from Exxon but they are still at loggerheads over it. (Additional reporting and writing by Jeremy Pelofsky in Washington with Chris Baltimore in Houston, Editing by Cynthia Osterman)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
olHarley wrote:
I have to kind of roll my eyes at this, because the real crime isn’t what was done that was illegal, but the extent to which this risky conduct was framed in a legal environment that limited liability, limited safety controls, and just generally let the “wisdom of the marketplace” guide these oil executives — in other words, let them run amok. If this criminal investigation amounts to anything I will be extremely surprised. What’s needful is a redo of the whole legal environment regarding facilities are so big that a single spill can wreck the Gulf. They have to either be limited to one in ten thousand year events, or shut down.

Jun 01, 2010 7:31pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
NEWSTIME2010 wrote:
BP may have to respond to the law suit with an automatic letter and email to the US authority: “Thank you for your interest in our operations and because of the quantity of the correspondence we receive we can not guarantee an answer. In case of urgency please contact nearest hospital,embassy or Wall street. Thanks again for your shown interest.”

Jun 01, 2010 7:41pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.