Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Weird homes

Home is where the heart is, no matter what unusual form that home may take.  Slideshow 

Photo

The drone wars

The frontlines of America's covert drone program.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Butt test shows U.S. cigarettes high in chemicals

Related Topics

Women smoke in central Sydney May 11, 2009. REUTERS/Daniel Munoz

Women smoke in central Sydney May 11, 2009.

Credit: Reuters/Daniel Munoz

WASHINGTON | Tue Jun 1, 2010 5:51pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Americans inhale more cancer-causing agents with their cigarettes, probably because of the tobacco blend, while smokers in Canada, Britain and Australia get less, U.S. researchers reported on Tuesday.

Their unique study also demonstrated that the amounts of these carcinogens in a smoker's cigarette butts directly correlated with tell-tale compounds in the smoker's urine.

The study, published in the June issue of Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, can help researchers trying to trace the harmful effects of smoking.

"We know that cigarettes from around the world vary in their ingredients and the way they are produced," said Dr. Jim Pirkle of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, who heads a lab using a mass spectrometer to measure levels of chemicals in people's bodies.

"All of these cigarettes contain harmful levels of carcinogens, but these findings show that amounts of tobacco-specific nitrosamines differ from country to country, and U.S. brands are the highest in the study," Pirkle said in a statement.

CDC's David Ashley and colleagues did in-depth tests using 126 smokers in the United States, Canada, Britain and Australia.

"Seventeen eligible cigarette brands (between 3 and 5 brands from each country) were selected on the basis of national sales and nicotine yield to identify popular brands with a range of ventilation," the researchers wrote. Ventilation is how much air is mixed in with the smoke from the cigarette as it is inhaled.

The volunteers had their saliva and urine tested and also turned over their used cigarette butts to the researchers.

FIVE MILLION DIE A YEAR

These were all tested for nicotine and for the chemicals 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK for short) and the breakdown product of NNK in the body, called NNAL.

These cancer-causing agents are known as tobacco-specific nitrosamines or TSNAs.

"We have shown a direct association between the 24-hour mouth-level exposure of NNK resulting from cigarette smoking and the concentration of its primary metabolite, NNAL, in the urine of smokers," the researchers wrote.

"Internal dose concentrations of urinary NNAL are significantly lower in smokers in countries that have lower TSNA levels in cigarettes such as Canada and Australia in contrast to countries that have high levels of these carcinogens in cigarettes, such as the United States."

The popular U.S. cigarette brands studied contained "American blend" tobacco, known to contain higher TSNA levels than the "bright" tobacco used in the most popular Australian, Canadian, and British brands.

Australian and Canadian smokers got more nicotine than U.S. and British smokers, but not of TSNAs.

The World Health Organizations says 5 million people die every year from tobacco-related heart attacks, strokes and cancers. Another 430,000 adults die annually from breathing second-hand smoke.

Some of the brands tested included:

* Marlboro, sold by Philip Morris International and Altria Group Inc's Philip Morris USA unit.

* Winfield, manufactured under license by British American Tobacco Australia.

* Silk Cut and Benson & Hedges, produced by Japan Tobacco Inc.

* Players, made by Canada's largest manufacturer, Imperial Tobacco, a division of Imasco Ltd.

* Camels, made by Reynolds American.

* Newports, made by Lorillard Inc.

(Editing by Julie Steenhuysen and Sandra Maler)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (19)
FOXSUX wrote:
Yes, not only are we # 1 in health care, we are # 1 in cigarettes.

Jun 01, 2010 6:14pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
cosmicdamian wrote:
This is really important information! If we simply change the blend of tobacco in our cigarettes, we could probably save tens of thousands of lives a year!

Jun 01, 2010 6:23pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
OrdinaryJoe wrote:
While it is nice they are finally acknowledging some of the problems. They don’t address several larger and more criminal actions by the tobacco company. For instance, did you know that tars and nicotines are NOT naturally occuring in cigarettes? Those chemicals are ADDED to the tobacco. And how about the 12 different ADDICTIVE chemicals that have added to the tobacco as well. Or the fact those 12 chemicals have increased 4 times in the amount a average cigarette contains in the last 5 years? The tobacco companies are murderer’s, plain and simple. They have known about the cancer causing properties since the 1950’s. FACT got to http://www.thetruth.com/facts/ and read for yourself.

Jun 01, 2010 6:31pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.