White House approves Louisiana berm plan: Jindal

VENICE, Louisiana Thu Jun 3, 2010 1:13am EDT

Oil floats on the surface of the Gulf of Mexico around a work boat at the site of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico June 2, 2010. REUTERS/Sean Gardner

Oil floats on the surface of the Gulf of Mexico around a work boat at the site of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico June 2, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Sean Gardner

Related Topics

VENICE, Louisiana (Reuters) - The White House on Wednesday approved plans to construct several large offshore sand berms that BP Plc will fund to help buffer the Louisiana coast from the giant oil slick in the Gulf of Mexico, Louisiana's governor said.

U.S. Coast Guard Admiral Thad Allen told BP to pay for the five berms approved by the White House, in addition to one he and the Army Corps of Engineers approved last week. The British energy company later said it supported the six projects and would pay the estimated $360 million cost to build them.

The decision marked a victory for Jindal, a rising Republican star who has lobbied for weeks to win support for the plan even as he steadfastly criticized BP and the Obama administration for what he has called a sluggish response to the oil spill.

The growing petroleum slick has damaged more than 140 miles of Louisiana's fragile coastline and largely shut down its seafood industry, idling thousands of fishermen.

Meanwhile, the BP offshore oil rig blowout and ensuing oil slick have posed a key test of the Obama administration's ability to handle a rapidly unfolding crisis.

"Our federal government does not need to be making excuses for BP," Jindal said at a news conference just moments before he received word of the White House decision. "Every day they wait, every day they make us wait, we're losing our battle to protect our coast."


The sand-berm construction plan essentially calls for the manufacture of six artificial barrier islands with sand dredged from the floor of the Gulf to help safeguard Louisiana's fragile bayous and marshlands from encroaching oil.

Critics have questioned whether the berms can be built up quickly enough to keep more oil from washing ashore.

But supporters of the plan say the spill is likely to remain a threat for months and that the berms could prove crucial in holding back oil debris that would otherwise be swept inland by hurricanes.

As much as 19,000 barrels of oil (800,000 gallons or 3 million liters) a day has been pouring into the Gulf of Mexico off the coast of Louisiana since the rig drilling a BP well exploded six weeks ago, killing 11 workers.

Almost 4 million feet (1.2 million meters) of protective boom has been deployed to protect wetlands, but Jindal said it was not enough and that it was more effective to clean the oil from sand than from fragile marshes and other coastal ecosystems.

"The right thing for us to do is to fight this oil on our sand," he said. "I'd much rather fight this oil on the sand than in our wetlands."

He was speaking after touring the wetlands in Pass a Loutre, an area that he said had been fouled by heavy oil over two weeks ago and where the oil remained, underscoring the difficulty of the clean-up effort.

Jindal said the impact on wildlife in areas that normally teemed with insects, birds and fish was obvious and that you "could hear the silence and smell the fumes."

Locals, worried for their future, applauded his efforts.

"Everybody is rallying around the governor," said Mike Frenette, the head of the Venice Charter Boat and Guide Association. "His pleas and demands and concerns are about as truthful as you can get."

(Editing by Mohammad Zargham and Will Dunham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
quueenie wrote:
Thanks Obama for NOTHING! If this were the San Francisco Bay or the Hudson River I bet Jindal would not have had to wait until the oil reached the coast for you to approve something! If the WHITE HOUSE would have approved this in the beginning then maybe our coast and the livlihood of the people in Louisiana would not be in jeopardy! Step up to the plate or get out of our way, we don’t need you nor do we want your red tape! By the way, shutting down platform operations is not a proactive measurement to save us, its just another idiotic way to kill us. Why don’t you try taking advice from anyone on the street and fire the people helping you make these decisions, they are idiotic! First, all wells should have 60 days to have an exit strategy, you know what that means don’t you? Then maybe you should allow drilling a little closer in, as it’s your fault we have to drill one mile deep in the first place… open up all that oil in alaska and stop trying to sound educated by speaking of cleaning up the environment when you can’t even get a berm approved in less than 45 days during an emergency situation!

Jun 03, 2010 1:00pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.