U.N. envoy accuses rights forum of turning blind eye

GENEVA Fri Jun 4, 2010 1:05pm EDT

Related Topics

GENEVA (Reuters) - An independent United Nations expert accused the main U.N. rights forum on Friday of turning a blind eye to killings in much of the world while concentrating on alleged abuses by Israel.

Philip Alston, U.N. special rapporteur on extrajudicial executions, said the 47-member-state Human Rights Council was losing credibility for mainly taking action against alleged violations in the Palestinian territories.

"I certainly regret the fact that the council itself has developed such a single-minded focus on violations in just one particular area while doing so little in almost any other area," Alston told a final news conference after six years in the post.

"I don't think it is sustainable. I think the council needs to improve its ability to have an impact on situations of human rights violations around the world."

The council agreed on Wednesday to set up an independent probe into what it called violations of international law in Israel's assault on a flotilla trying to bring aid to Gaza. Nine pro-Palestinian activists died in Monday's raid.

The Geneva forum, set up in June 2006, is effectively controlled by developing countries, among which the Organization for the Islamic Conference (OIC) has strong influence and regularly condemns the Jewish state.

Alston, while welcoming the council's move on Gaza, said he regretted its failure to act on Sri Lanka, both a year ago as the 25-year conflict drew to a close and at its current session.


"I felt that the same principle would apply in relation to Sri Lanka where the allegations, at least the most recent by the International Crisis Group, suggest a figure of as high as 30,000 people who may have died in the last few months of the conflict," he said.

In a speech on Thursday, Alston called for an independent international inquiry, noting that the council had rejected the proposal a year ago, but said that there was now "a great deal of new evidence which would warrant effective action."

Sri Lanka's Attorney-General Mohan Pieris angrily took the floor on Friday to reject the allegations as "based on unsubstantiated, uncorroborated hearsay."

The government declared total victory a year ago over the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, which fought for over three decades to establish a separate nation for the Tamil minority.

Sri Lanka's government has repeatedly rejected charges of killings of civilians as grossly exaggerated and denied its security forces committed war crimes.

President Mahinda Rajapaksa last month named a panel to examine the lessons of the last seven years of the war, in terms of reconciliation and preventing future violence.

"I believe there is no realistic prospect this internal initiative will give serious meaningful consideration to very significant violations that exist," Alston said, adding that Sri Lankan domestic inquiries since 1977 had "all failed."

Alston said he regretted the council's failure to take action on his report on executions of juvenile criminals in Iran, and on police-run death squads in Kenya which had killed hundreds.

The Australian expert, who teaches at New York University School of Law, has visited 14 countries since taking up the mandate in 2004. A successor is to be appointed in coming weeks.

"If the council has the political will it can do even more to prevent unlawful killings around the world and to tackle widespread impunity," he said on Thursday.

(Reporting by Stephanie Nebehay; editing by Jonathan Lynn and Andrew Roche)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
hmp49 wrote:
Not the first to say so.

Mary Robinson, no friend of Israel (she organized the rabidly anti-Zionist Durban Conference) explains why she turned down the commission that Goldstone later headed:


As a former UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, I felt strongly that the Council’s resolution was one-sided and did not permit a balanced approach to determining the situation on the ground. It referred only to “the grave violations of human rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, particularly due to the recent Israeli military attacks,” and called for a mission to investigate “all violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law by the occupying power, Israel, against the Palestinian people.”

I was also aware that the UN Human Rights Council had made repeated condemnations of Israel over the past two years but had focused little attention on large-scale violations of human rights in other countries. This pattern of action and inaction by the Council has given greater credence to those who believe the UN’s highest human rights body is inherently anti-Israel.


I don’t expect many comments on this article – truth doesn’t go over particularly well where people are lead around by the nose with their easily manipulated emotions.

Jun 04, 2010 9:54pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.