Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Devastated by Tornado

A huge tornado tears through an Oklahoma City suburb.  Slideshow 

Photo

Message of humility

A religious fraternity in Rio considers the election of Pope Francis, a confirmation of their beliefs in poverty and simplicity.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

U.S. faces remote sabotage cyber danger: general

Related Topics

The National Security Agency building is shown in Fort Meade, Maryland September 19, 2007. REUTERS/Jason Reed

The National Security Agency building is shown in Fort Meade, Maryland September 19, 2007.

Credit: Reuters/Jason Reed

WASHINGTON | Fri Jun 4, 2010 8:43am EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Defense Department must be able to operate freely in cyberspace amid dangers of "remote sabotage," an Army general tapped to streamline offensive and defensive computer operations said on Thursday.

The potential for sabotage and destruction is "something we must treat very seriously," General Keith Alexander said in his first public remarks since the new U.S. Cyber Command was activated on May 21.

"In short, we face a dangerous combination of known and unknown vulnerabilities, strong adversary capabilities and weak situational awareness," he told an audience at the Center for Strategic & International Studies, a private research group in Washington.

"Our Department of Defense must be able to operate freely and defend its resources in cyberspace," Alexander said.

U.S. foes will find the weakest link and exploit it, whether it is public or privately owned and operated, he said.

"America's very wealth and strength make it a target in cyberspace," Alexander said.

Senior aides to President Barack Obama are weighing such issues as how the laws of warfare apply to a digital attack routed through a neutral country, he said.

CYBER ATTACKS ON ESTONIA, GEORGIA

"What we don't have is the precision in those standing rules of engagement, yet, that we need," Alexander said.

He referred to "distributed denial-of-service attacks" that interfered with government functions in Estonia in 2007 and in Georgia in 2008.

Although information systems were able to resume functioning after the attacks stopped, they show that "the potential for sabotage and destruction is now possible," he said.

Alexander also heads the Pentagon's communications-intercepting National Security Agency, or NSA.

He said new rules for U.S. military operations in cyberspace were being prepared by the Defense Department's policy office, subject to approval by the "deputies committee," the highest level interagency body dealing with national security issues.

Defense Department systems are probed by unauthorized users roughly 250,000 times an hour, or more than 6 million times a day, Alexander said.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates began streamlining U.S. military cyber operations "as a result of serious intrusions into our classified networks" in late 2008, he said.

The new Cyber Command is aimed at synchronizing offensive and defensive cyber capabilities "as well as the need to leverage NSA's intelligence capabilities to support our understanding of the threat and our ability to respond it," he added.

Until recently, the military's cyber efforts were run by a loose web of joint task forces "spread too far and too wide, geographically and institutionally, to be effective," Deputy Defense Secretary William Lynn said in a guest piece in the Wall Street Journal on Thursday.

"Now cyber attacks can strike in less than the blink of an eye," Lynn wrote. "In the face of this threat, the U.S. military must be ready to defend our country at network speed."

More than 100 intelligence agencies and foreign militaries are actively trying to penetrate U.S. systems and weapons-system blueprints are among the documents that have been compromised, Lynn said.

(Editing by Eric Walsh)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
The US has the most sophisticated technology with respect to Computer Network software and hardware.It should not a big problem
http://Greenworldinvestor.com

Jun 04, 2010 9:40am EDT  --  Report as abuse
doesntmatter wrote:
I know that this is a completely crazy idea… but why not keep high security sensitive data off of networked computers?

Jun 04, 2010 2:26pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
NicoN wrote:
A clear distinction between Defensive and Offensive capabilities need to be drawn so as to develop clear policy statements for each. A Defensive capability does not impose a threat to civil rights whereas Offensive capabilities are a threat and can more easily breach ones right to privacy. It is one thing to clampdown firewalls, monitor routers and so on, and another to snif and search network traffic, target public switches, penetrate private networks. This can be a very slipper slope if we are not careful.

Jun 04, 2010 5:52pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.