The dome of the Capitol is reflected in a puddle in Washington February 17, 2012.REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

Another debt ceiling debacle could sink the economy

Last year's Congressional debt standoff hurt consumer confidence more than the collapse of Lehman Brothers, Betsey Johnson and Justin Wolfers write. This time could be worse.  Read more at Counterparties  

U.S. says oil spill cleanup may take years

Related Topics

1 of 34. A pelican sits covered with oil from the Deepwater Horizon wellhead in Barataria Bay, Louisiana just off the Gulf of Mexico June 6, 2010. BP's containment cap is capturing an increasing amount of oil spewing from a ruptured Gulf of Mexico well, but the U.S. admiral leading the government relief effort said on Sunday the coast will be under siege from the massive spill for many more months.

Credit: Reuters/Jose Luis Magana/Greenpeace/Handout

WASHINGTON/VENICE, Louisiana | Mon Jun 7, 2010 7:56pm EDT

WASHINGTON/VENICE, Louisiana (Reuters) - Energy giant BP Plc seeks to double the amount of oil it captures from its ruptured Gulf of Mexico well, while the U.S. Gulf Coast will be struggling with the environmental mess from the huge spill for years, the Coast Guard said on Monday.

Coast Guard Admiral Thad Allen, who leads the government's relief effort, said London-based BP hoped to collect 20,000 barrels (840,000 gallons/3.18 million liters) per day in its latest effort to contain the worst spill in U.S. history, which has now affected 120 miles of coastline.

The figure underscored some scientists' concerns that the May 27 government estimate of up to 19,000 barrels coming daily from the well a mile under the sea may be too low. BP had estimated the flow at just 5,000 barrels a day.

Neither Allen nor BP gave an estimate of how much oil is still flowing into the Gulf.

The 49-day-old spill is causing an ecological and economic disaster along the U.S. Gulf Coast, and testing Barack Obama's presidency.

BP's latest effort to contain the gushing oil is the first positive sign after a series of failed attempts fueled public anger at the company.

The earlier efforts generated initial optimism that an end to the crisis was in sight, but those hopes were dashed when the crude kept spewing out. Allen said BP's latest attempt -- placing a containment cap on top of the gushing pipe on the ocean floor -- appeared to be going "fairly well."

Allen said cleaning up the oil spill will take at least four to six weeks after the well is eventually sealed -- expected to be in August. But dealing with the long-term environmental effects will take years, he said.

"We're no longer dealing with a large, monolithic spill. We're dealing with an aggregation of hundreds of thousands of patches of oil that are going a lot of different directions," Allen said, stressing the broad dispersal of the oil.

"Dealing with the oil spill on the surface is going to go on for a couple of months" once the well is plugged, Allen said. "Long-term issues of restoring the environment and the habitats ... will be years."

Obama said after meeting with Cabinet officials at the White House that the economic impact of the spill, which threatens the Gulf Coast's multibillion-dollar fishing industry, will be substantial.

He said the U.S. government would "ride herd" on BP to make sure that it paid damage claims from Gulf Coast residents, who have complained that the company is not paying them promptly.

He was also pushing BP to be prepared for a possible hurricane in the Gulf. The Atlantic hurricane season, which is forecast to be unusually active this year, began last week, typically peaks in August and ends in November.

BP said it was preparing a system that, in case of a hurricane approaching, would allow the drillship collecting the oil to disconnect from a pipe that floats up to about 300 feet below the water's surface and get out of the storm's path. It is expected to be operational by early July.

BP STOCK

BP shares, which have lost about a third of their value since the crisis began, closed slightly lower in London trading. In New York, BP's American depositary shares closed down 1.1 percent.

"With the right LMRP (containment cap) efficiency and surface skimming response, we may have turned the corner on shoreline oil spill volumes," analysts at Credit Suisse said in a research note.

But there were still signs of investor skepticism.

Goldman Sachs downgraded its rating on BP to "neutral" from "buy," saying the spill would impact the London-based company's ability to do business worldwide, while Nordic bank Nordea said it had divested all its BP shares, worth about 10 million euros ($12 million) from its funds.

Containing the spill is a critical test for BP and Obama.

Images of birds struggling through oil-soaked waters ringing Louisiana's ecologically fragile barrier islands and marshes have added to the pressure on Obama, who already faces growing public criticism over his handling of the crisis.

A new Washington Post/ABC poll found that 69 percent of Americans believe the government had done a "not so good" or "poor" job handling the spill. Just over 1,000 people were surveyed in the poll, conducted between June 3 and 6.

'THE BIG UNKNOWN'

The new BP effort involves placing a containment cap with a seal on remnants of a pipe at the deep-sea wellhead. Oil is channeled to a ship for later processing at a refinery ashore.

BP said it collected 10,500 barrels of oil on Saturday and 11,100 barrels on Sunday, with 27,700 barrels of oil collected between June 3, when the operation began, and June 6.

"We still don't know what the flow rate is. That's the big unknown right now," Allen said.

One high-end estimate by a U.S. government expert panel puts the leak at 25,000 barrels (1.05 million gallons/3.97 million liters) a day.

Allen said BP would send a second rig to the spill site to help capture the oil "and the combination of these two ... will have a production capability of about 20,000 barrels a day."

"Our aim is to capture all the oil, whatever that volume is," a BP spokesman said in response to Allen's statement, without confirming the figure given by the admiral.

A live video feed of the seabed leak shows black crude still billowing into the sea.

BP and government officials have said a definitive solution will not come until August when a relief well is drilled. This is intended to intersect the leaking well and allow it to be sealed.

After contaminating wetland wildlife refuges in Louisiana and barrier islands in Mississippi and Alabama, oil has begun to hit some of the famous white beaches of Florida, where the $60 billion-a-year tourism industry accounts for nearly 1 million jobs.

As clean-up crews raked up oil debris and oiled seaweed on Pensacola Beach in the northwest Florida Panhandle, visitors seemed undeterred by the pollution threat.

"It's an awful crisis but we're really not going to let it ruin our vacation," said Jennifer Blow from New Orleans.

One-third of the Gulf's federal waters, or 78,000 square miles (200,000 square km), remains closed to fishing, and the toll of dead and injured birds and marine animals is climbing.

(Additional reporting by Bruce Nichols in Houston, Tom Brown in Miami, Jeff Mason, Matt Spetalnick in Washington, Tom Bergin in London; writing by Pascal Fletcher and Ross Colvin; editing by Will Dunham and Mohammad Zargham)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (33)
msavage wrote:
The crude oil is toxic!! Workers cleaning the oily Gulf beaches need to know the danger. Don’t become BP’s Collateral Damaged, like Exxon’s Collateral Damaged.

http://www.lvrj.com/news/exxon-valdez-oil-risks-spur-warning-for-gulf-cleanup-crews-93258964.html
http://www.propublica.org/ion/blog/item/former-valdez-cleanup-worker-warns-of-toxic-dangers-in-the-gulf

My name is Merle Savage, a female general foreman during the Exxon Valdez oil spill (EVOS) beach cleanup in 1989. I am one of the 11,000+ cleanup workers from the Exxon Valdez oil spill (EVOS), who is suffering from health issues from that toxic cleanup, without compensation from Exxon.

Dr. Riki Ott visited me in 2007 to explain about the toxic spraying on the beaches. She also informed me that Exxon’s medical records and the reports that surfaced in litigation by sick workers in 1994, had been sealed from the public, making it impossible to hold Exxon responsible for their actions.
http://www.rikiott.com

Exxon developed the toxic spraying; OSHA, the Coast Guard, and the state of Alaska authorized the procedure. Beach crews breathed in crude oil that splashed off the rocks and into the air — the toxic exposure turned into chronic breathing conditions and central nervous system problems, neurological impairment, chronic respiratory disease, leukemia, lymphoma, brain tumors, liver damage, and blood disease.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5632208859935499100

My web site is devoted to searching for EVOS cleanup workers who were exposed to the toxic spraying, and are suffering from the same illnesses that I have. There is an on going Longshoreman’s claim for workers with medical problems from the oil cleanup. Our summer employment turned into a death sentence for many — and a life of unending medical conditions for the rest of Exxon’s Collateral Damaged.
http://www.silenceinthesound.com/stories.shtml

Jun 06, 2010 9:40pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Alkan wrote:
Alkan here:

The new system they are talking about is most likely connecting flow pipe to to the surface from the two valves low on the BOP they used for pumping for days trying a “top kill”. That should get another few thousand barrels a day flow and hopefully reduce the leak some to the ocean from the poor seal method they used with the big rubber gasket.

Rubber gaskets are for garden hoses. Lead or some maleable metal is better for 10,000 psi plus using a compression clamp to squeeze the pipes together and against the lead gasket or liner.

http://i1000.photobucket.com/albums/af122/alkanalkan/A-Solution.jpg?t=1275769802

The idea is shown here but any variation of a a compression clamp with a soft metal gasket will work.

Jun 06, 2010 10:00pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
jopocop wrote:
Evidence seems convincing that the public has been deceived for way too long on the actual amount of leakage from the blown out well, both before the riser pipe was sawed off, and since then.

The latest news is that the diversion to the top is maxed out now, around 15,000 barrels, per day. However, what if the amount of leakage is double, triple or even more.

The oil companies are drilling all the time and know what is the amount of oil coming out naturally from their wells. Why is this one any different?

Not only the oil companies but, the USA Govt should be able to nail down much more exactly the amount of oil being emitted.

Fox News today announced that the Govt has been holding back a revised and more honest report, where the oil blowout is way over 30,000 barrels.

First, look at the widespread oil slick and miles of beach now affected, indicating strongly after all that the spill has been super big from day one.

This is even after all of the burning, cleanup, natural eradication by sea bacteria, skimming and all else being done to remove oil from the sea and beaches.

It is one thing for BP to lie to America, but our own Govt hiding the truth?

That is just inexcusable and constitutes grounds for job firing of any Govt officials that have engaged in such cover up.

If Obama has known the truth of the amount of oil spill, but has covered it up, that means impeachment time for him as a supreme act of dishonesty to the American people.

Jun 06, 2010 10:48pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.