Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Weird homes

Home is where the heart is, no matter what unusual form that home may take.  Slideshow 

Photo

The drone wars

The frontlines of America's covert drone program.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Dissent in doctors group on Medicare reform

Related Topics

BOSTON | Wed Jun 9, 2010 5:32pm EDT

BOSTON (Reuters) - Most of the American Medical Association's own members disagreed with its campaign against the expansion of Medicare during the 2009 healthcare debate, according to a survey published on Wednesday.

"This data suggests the AMA may not be representing physicians' views on many issues," Dr. Salomeh Keyhani of Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York said in a telephone interview.

"In the most controversial debate in our time, the AMA's position was out of line with the majority of physicians."

The survey of about 2,200 doctors found that only 14 percent of AMA members agreed with the 163-year-old organization's stand that uninsured people should primarily be covered by private companies.

"We considered a physician as endorsing the AMA's platform if he or she agreed with private expansions only and opposed the expansion of Medicare," Keyhani and colleague Dr. Alex Federman wrote in results published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

"Only 12.5 percent of all physicians responding, and 14.2 percent of AMA members, supported the AMA's viewpoint on coverage expansions."

The AMA, which represents about 23 percent of the nearly 1.1 million physicians and medical students in the United States, said its positions are developed from a democratic process.

"AMA has long-supported a uniquely American health care system that includes both private insurance for the majority and a robust public safety net for vulnerable patients," AMA President Dr. James Rohack said in a statement.

The doctors who supported the AMA position tended to be younger, male, practicing in rural areas, from the West and Midwest, and in specialties with less patient interaction, such as radiology, pathology and anesthesiology.

But even in those categories, the rate of support for the AMA position was no higher than 16 percent.

Only 8 percent of female doctors supported the AMA position during the healthcare reform debate.

Keyhani said that was very important because "women are such a rising demographic in health care. Some medical schools have greater than 50 percent females in their entering class."

(Editing by Maggie Fox and Cynthia Osterman)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
AmerMedAssn wrote:
This article ignores the fact that this survey does not accurately describe AMA’s position, clearly skewing the results. The survey authors paint AMA as supporting “private expansion only” when we have long supported a public-private mix. In a year-old article on this same survey data, the authors admit to a “modest” response rate and conclude that “the majority of physicians support using both public and private insurance options to expand coverage” – as does AMA. The survey authors fixate on Medicare expansion, which was only considered in one of three bills in discussion last year in Congress. As physicians now face a 21 percent Medicare payment cut that hurts seniors’ access to care, expanding coverage to more people would worsen Medicare’s financial woes and have the unintended consequence of reducing patients’ access to health care. The bottom line is that AMA supported health system reform based on policies created by the AMA House of Delegates through a democratic process including physicians and medical students from every state and every qualifying medical specialty. The new health care law expands coverage to millions more Americans through both public and private insurance.

Jun 10, 2010 3:05pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.