SEC examining Goldman Sachs' Hudson deals: report

Related Topics

A Goldman Sachs sign is seen at the New York Stock Exchange April 21, 2010. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid

A Goldman Sachs sign is seen at the New York Stock Exchange April 21, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Brendan McDermid

NEW YORK | Thu Jun 10, 2010 8:42am EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, which charged Goldman Sachs Group Inc with fraud in April, is investigating another mortgage-linked deal once pitched by the Wall Street firm, the Financial Times reported, citing people close to the matter.

The SEC has been gathering information about Hudson Mezzanine Funding, a $2 billion collateralized debt obligation, but the probe was preliminary and there was no certainty it would lead to additional charges against Goldman, The Financial Times reported.

Goldman declined to comment on the report.

In April, U.S. securities regulators charged the powerful Wall Street bank with civil fraud in connection with the structuring and sale of another CDO called Abacus 2007.

The Financial Times said the Hudson probe is part of a wider investigation into CDO securities dealing on Wall Street.

On Wednesday, an Australian hedge fund sued Goldman over its investment in the Timberwolf CDO, claiming the subprime mortgage-linked security contributed to the fund's demise in 2007.

(Reporting by Steve Eder, editing by Maureen Bavdek)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
GigelM wrote:
Based on an article that appeared in The Wall Street Challenger the use of Synthetic CDOs after November 2005 would have been with some mischievous intention (since home prices appreciated at a high rate till almost the end of 2007 and peaking in 2005).

Using home prices forecast it is hard to believe that the financial institutions and credit rating agencies involved in the CDO business had sophisticated risk analysis simulations, but did not forecast price movements of the underlying collateral.

CDOs played a notable role in the financial markets. The constructors of the CDOs may not bear direct responsibility. Rather their reckless use, misunderstanding and ignorance of key warning signs likely contributed to the magnitude of the financial crisis. You can observe the financial landscape today and recognize from the survivors, walking wounded and the absentees those who knew and those who had not understood the use of these tools.

See article that appeared in http://thewallstreetchallenger.com/Index/Did_CDO_caused_FC.htm

Jun 10, 2010 8:50am EDT  --  Report as abuse
plubber wrote:
Another tick of approval I suppose!

Jun 10, 2010 9:16am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.