Apple faces antitrust scrutiny: report

Related Topics

1 of 2. A shopworker is reflected in the screen of an iPad tablet computer at an Apple store while demonstrating the device during its UK launch in central London May 28, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Luke MacGregor

Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:52pm EDT

(Reuters) - U.S. antitrust regulators plan to investigate whether Apple is unfairly restricting rivals such as Google from carrying ads on the iPhone, iPad and iPod, the Financial Times said.

The regulators have already started scanning Apple's actions, the paper said, citing people familiar with the move.

But it is not yet clear whether the Federal Trade Commission or the Department of Justice would take up an investigation, the Times said.

Apple could not immediately be reached for comment by Reuters outside regular U.S. business hours.

On Wednesday, Google said recent changes to Apple's developers agreement would effectively cripple Google's advertising tools for the iPhone, creating "artificial" barriers to competition.

Apple changed the language of the agreement on Monday, which now appears to prohibit certain third-party ad agencies from collecting critical usage data from iPhone applications.

(Reporting by Sakthi Prasad in Bangalore; Editing by Mike Nesbit)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
Leopoldina wrote:
Apple new technologies as IPad, IOS4 are available, as said, in 12 countries.
How international Ads agency will work worldwide with commercial policy inside other relevant markets, as BRICS

Jun 10, 2010 8:59am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.