Sponsored Links

BP to nearly double siphoning in July-Coast Guard

HOUSTON, June 11 | Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:34am EDT

HOUSTON, June 11 (Reuters) - BP Plc. (BP.L) (BP.N) will seek to nearly double its oil collection capacity by mid-July, the top U.S. official overseeing the Gulf of Mexico spill cleanup effort said on Friday.

Once a "hard cap" containment system is in place by the middle of July, BP's oil-siphoning capacity will rise to up to 50,000 barrels per day, Coast Guard Admiral Thad Allen told reporters at a briefing in Washington.

BP's collection capacity is currently about 18,000 bpd, and will increase to about 28,000 bpd once a new oil-flaring rig is activated next week, Allen said.

(Reporting by Chris Baltimore)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (53)
VitaminD3Man wrote:
How can they be siphoning up to 50,000 bbls./day when the they told us the leak was only 5,000 bbls./day?

I think BP execs should be made to drink the difference…

Jun 11, 2010 11:01am EDT  --  Report as abuse
skilb wrote:
Honestly Rainbird, I can’t believe your attitude. Why are you so intent on making this an issue about Britain? It’s got nothing to do with the UK.

BP are not a British company, they haven’t been in a long time (by name and nature). They are a multinational, in the same way ExxonMobil are. They are floated on the NY stock exchange, as well as London. They employ 23,000 in the US, and under 15,000 in the UK.

I work offshore, and never see anybody smoking on platforms like you do in the gulf of mexico. US offshore regulations are laxx compared with the rest of the world, and well behind UK North Sea, and Norwegian North Sea standards. The valve was not tested correctly, but I seem to remember this was the responsibility of Haliburton to maintain (ahh, a US company??).

I agree with VitaminD3man, make the exec’s drink it, it’s the fault of BP and haliburton, oh and maybe lax regulations by the authorities in charge of offshore drilling in the US – which is why Barrack is finger pointing and making this such a political thing).

Let’s hope that BEYOND PETROLEUM (as they’ve been known for decades) sort this out, and quickly for the sake of the gulf.

Jun 11, 2010 11:43am EDT  --  Report as abuse
skilb wrote:
Honestly Rainbird, I can’t believe your attitude. Why are you so intent on making this an issue about Britain? It’s got nothing to do with the UK.

BP are not a British company, they haven’t been in a long time (by name and nature). They are a multinational, in the same way ExxonMobil are. They are floated on the NY stock exchange, as well as London. They employ 23,000 in the US, and under 15,000 in the UK.

I work offshore, and never see anybody smoking on platforms like you do in the gulf of mexico. US offshore regulations are laxx compared with the rest of the world, and well behind UK North Sea, and Norwegian North Sea standards. The valve was not tested correctly, but I seem to remember this was the responsibility of Haliburton to maintain (ahh, a US company??).

I agree with VitaminD3man, make the exec’s drink it, it’s the fault of BP and haliburton, oh and maybe lax regulations by the authorities in charge of offshore drilling in the US – which is why Barrack is finger pointing and making this such a political thing).

Let’s hope that BEYOND PETROLEUM (as they’ve been known for decades) sort this out, and quickly for the sake of the gulf.

Jun 11, 2010 11:43am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.