U.S. negotiators battle over shareholder rights

Thu Jun 17, 2010 2:15pm EDT

* SEC has proposed proxy access rules

* Senators backing 5 percent threshold

* Big investors say that's too high

By Rachelle Younglai

WASHINGTON, June 17 (Reuters) - Giving shareholders more say on how companies are governed has emerged as one of the sticking points for U.S. lawmakers negotiating the final financial regulation bill.

Senate negotiators agreed on Thursday to only allow shareholders owning at least 5 percent of a company for more than two years to nominate a corporate board director.

There is "real angst" over the Senate's proposal, Democratic Representative Barney Frank said.

Frank is leading negotiations to merge the House of Representatives' regulation bill with the Senate's version.

Both bills affirm the Securities and Exchange Commission's authority to give shareholders "proxy access" or access to the corporate proxy document, which is controlled by management.

In an attempt to win Republican support, Democratic senators are trying to limit which shareholders can nominate a director for the corporate board.

The Securities and Exchange Commission has already proposed setting the threshold at a sliding scale between 1 percent and 5 percent, with the lowest threshold for larger companies. Shareholders would have to own stakes for at least a year.

Lawmakers from the House and Senate must broadly agree on provisions to be included in the final financial regulation bill. They have already resolved some contentious issues such as new rules for credit rating agencies, but must hash out a slew of other rules for the financial system.

Corporate governance issues were not expected to divide House and Senate Democrats. But Frank and his fellow Democrats appear unlikely to accept the Senate's language.

"Five percent is a lot to have to own in a company," Frank told reporters after Democratic senators proposed the threshold on Wednesday. "The Senate proposes to restrict the SEC significantly."

The Council of Institutional Investors, which represents public, union and corporate pension funds with more than $3 trillion in assets, is urging House lawmakers to defeat the Senate's measure.

"A 5 percent ownership requirement would effectively shut out those large, long-term, responsible investors -- largely public and union pension funds -- most willing to engage companies and hold them accountable," the group said in a letter to House negotiators.

Although shareholders can nominate directors, they can only do so by waging a proxy fight, which many contend is costly and burdensome. Business groups such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce oppose proxy access, fearing that special interest groups that lack business acumen or long-term vision for running a company could take over the boards. (Editing by Leslie Adler)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
HilaryLo wrote:
Rich guys are so afraid they won’t be able to use their companies as their own personal piggy banks anymore. What we really need is a cap on compensation across the board. Rich people are dangerous.

Jun 17, 2010 4:25pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.