U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

Justice still reviewing Arizona immigration law

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Thu Jun 17, 2010 6:06pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Justice Department is still reviewing a possible challenge to the controversial Arizona immigration law, a spokesman said on Thursday, despite a statement last week by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that a lawsuit to challenge it would be pursued.

Clinton said in a television interview in Ecuador on June 8 that President Barack Obama had ordered the Justice Department to challenge the Arizona law because he did not believe states should not set immigration policies, which could differ.

"President Obama has spoken out against the law because he thinks that the federal government should be determining immigration policy," she said according to a transcript posted on the State Department website.

"And the Justice Department, under his direction, will be bringing a lawsuit against the act," she told NTN24, which is headquartered in Colombia.

However, both the White House and Justice Department declined to confirm or deny the presidential directive.

"The department continues to review the law," said Justice Department spokesman Matthew Miller.

The Arizona law is an effort to stop the state from serving as a principal corridor for illegal immigrants to enter the country from Mexico, and from being a busy entry point for Mexican cartels smuggling drugs to a voracious U.S. market.

The law, set to take effect next month, would require officers to determine the immigration status of any person they suspect of being in the country illegally.

Critics, including top Obama administration officials, have said it could effectively permit racial profiling and may be unconstitutional.

The news of the plan from Clinton's remarks drew a sharp rebuke by Arizona Governor Jan Brewer who has been a big proponent of the state law and recently met with Obama to discuss her concerns about border security.

"To learn of this lawsuit through an Ecuadorean interview with the Secretary of State is just outrageous," she said in a statement. "If our own government intends to sue our state to prevent illegal immigration enforcement, the least it can do is inform us before it informs the citizens of another nation."

Until Clinton's remarks, officials had said only that they had concerns about the law and that they were looking at their options which included a legal challenge. About 10.8 million illegal immigrants are believed to be in the United States.

The fight over the law has jump-started efforts in Washington to pass a comprehensive reform bill to address illegal immigration. But it was unclear whether Congress would approve a law in a year when many face re-election bids.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
FrankD wrote:
Your statement is incorrect. The bill- now law- Only allows officers to determine the immigration status of those that have committed a crime. Once they are arrested, the officer may then look into the persons immigration status. This law also MIRRORS the federal law.

Jun 17, 2010 5:25pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
colby1962 wrote:
They want them to go by federal law. Maybe if they would stand behind this law they wouldn’t have to have their own.
I think we should adopt Mexico’s imagration law. That is better then ours and they enforce theirs. You get caught there you go atraight to prison for a year then you are deported. If you are illegal there and have a baby, that baby isn’t a citizen. both are deported. Whats wrong with us doing the same thing. Are politicans hurting that much for votes? That they want to take care of the hispanic vote. Any politican that tries to block this will never get another vote from my house.
Why not let all the Americans in prison out. If the illegals don’t have to go by our laws, why should American citizens.

Jun 17, 2010 6:02pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
BillyD51 wrote:
This “Racial Profiling” kills me. It might look like a Mexican and talk like a Mexican, but don’t call it a Mexican because thats racial profiling and that’s illegal! This Politically Correct BS make me sick! No wonder nothing gets done in this country. We have become a society of morons who can’t see the forest for the trees! What ever happened to the majority rules in democracy? I don’t blame the illegals, I blame the politicians of the good old U.S. of A.. Seems they get dumber every year…(perhaps because they spend too much time begging campaign contributions and not enough time actually earning their pay checks)! They forget they were ELECTED to their positions and not placed there by birth right.

My age and physical condition prevents me from taking to the streets in revolt but I won’t be surprised when it happens. If the federal government won’t protect us from an illegal invasion, then we must turn to the states. If the states won’t help, it’s time to take matters into our own hands. Think on that a while!

I for one applaud Arizona for saying “Enough is Enough! Go Jan Brewer!!!

Jun 17, 2010 6:06pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.