Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Weird homes

Home is where the heart is, no matter what unusual form that home may take.  Slideshow 

Photo

The drone wars

The frontlines of America's covert drone program.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Putin boasts new jet fighter better than U.S. plane

Related Topics

MOSCOW | Thu Jun 17, 2010 5:26pm EDT

MOSCOW (Reuters) - Prime Minister Vladimir Putin climbed into the cockpit of Russia's newest fighter jet on Thursday and said it would trump a U.S.-built rival, the F-22 Raptor.

Putin watched a test flight of a "fifth-generation" stealth fighter, dubbed the T-50 and billed as Russia's first all-new warplane since the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.

"This machine will be superior to our main competitor, the F-22, in terms of maneuverability, weaponry and range," Putin told the pilot after the flight, according to an account on the government website.

Putin said the plane would cost up to three times less than similar aircraft in the West and could remain in service for 30 to 35 years with upgrades, according to the report.

Successful development of the fighter, built by Sukhoi, is crucial to showing Russia can challenge U.S. technology and modernize its military after a period of post-Soviet decay.

Russia also plans to manufacture T-50s jointly with India.

The F-22 raptor stealth fighter first flew in 1997 and is the only fifth-generation fighter in service. Fifth-generation aircraft have advanced flight and weapons control systems and can cruise at supersonic speeds.

According to the government website, the test pilot told Putin the controls of the T-50 allowed the pilot to operate most of the plane's systems without taking his hands off the joystick, which he said would be very useful under high forces of gravity.

"I know, I've flown," Putin replied. Sukhoi has said the plane should be ready for use in 2015.

(Writing by Steve Gutterman; Editing by Elizabeth Fullerton and Robert Woodward)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (167)
aroleflin wrote:
No doubt, like history has shown us, the Russians copied and stole our design. Ever notice that their Space Shuttle was almost identical. And remember their reverse engineering of our B-29 at the end of WWII. Two B-29’s had to land in the Russian east and the Ruskies refused to give them back……because they wanted to cheat and steal our technology. Their aircraft also mimick almost identically our F-15 and 16’s. Communist China is just as dishonest.

Jun 17, 2010 7:13pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
dmoney18692 wrote:
Great, so in 5 years they will have a plane as good as the F-22. So that means for 18 years we have been completely dominant. UH, wonder what we’ve been doing in those 15 years? Surely we weren’t designing new better planes…. NAH.

Jun 17, 2010 7:16pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
RathaPM wrote:
And, of course, the western media simply parrots anything the Russians say about the capability of their technology. The T-50 is widely seen by analysts to be an impressive airplane, but no one outside of some avowedly anti-American analysts believes it is a serious challenger to the F-22. That these claims of comparability, much less superiority, are so quickly and unquestioningly swalloed by the western press is bizarre. They do the same thing over Russian subs, ships, and missiles. I honestly do not understand it. You can shake a stick on the internet and find two dozen non-American analysts who could have been interviewed to provide a quote for this article that would have turned the entire premise that this plane is “superior” on its head, yet no one bothers.

Jun 17, 2010 7:16pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.