Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Flooding in India

Heavy monsoon rains have swollen several rivers.  Slideshow 

Photo

Celebrity portraits

Up close and personal with famous faces.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Tax, jobs bill blocked in Senate

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Thu Jun 17, 2010 9:54pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A Democratic bill to extend jobless benefits and raise taxes on investment fund managers failed a key vote in the Senate on Thursday, dealing a blow to President Barack Obama's push to boost the economy.

The bill would have extended popular business tax breaks, stopped a 21 percent Medicare pay cut for doctors treating elderly patients and extended extra Medicaid money to cash-strapped states. Democratic leaders failed to muster the 60 votes needed to overcome solid Republican opposition to the bill, which would have added about $55 billion to the deficit over 10 years. The Senate voted 56-40 against the measure.

The defeat sent Democratic leaders back to the negotiating table to try to win support from a few moderate Republicans.

"We're not going to give up," said Democratic Leader Harry Reid. It was unclear when the Senate would take up the measure again.

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus said that "everything would be on the table" in an effort to try to win support from at least a few Republicans.

Republican opponents argued that the bill would add billions to an already bloated $1.4 trillion budget deficit. Democratic leaders had scaled back the bill from a version that failed a test vote earlier this week. That version would have added about $80 billion to the deficit over 10 years.

The Senate earlier in the day had rejected a Republican alternative that would have been paid for by across-the-board spending cuts for non-defense programs and freezing pay for federal workers.

"Americans are frustrated with the amount of spending and borrowing that we're doing around here," said Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell.

The deficit and $13 trillion national debt are becoming major issues in the November midterm congressional elections in which Republicans hope to gain control of Congress. Obama over the weekend had urged lawmakers in a letter to move swiftly to approve new measures to "spur job creation and build momentum toward recovery."

The House of Representatives passed its version of the tax bill last month. On Thursday the House also approved a $30 billion plan to boost capital at independent community banks to encourage them to lend money to small businesses, which account for a large portion of jobs growth in the United States.

REVISIONS IN THE SENATE

Democratic leaders had scaled back their earlier bill in order to overcome growing concerns about its impact on the deficit. They removed a $25 a week unemployment insurance benefit increase that had been added in last year's economic stimulus plan.

In the midst of the devastating oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, the bill also raised the oil spill liability trust fund tax to 49 cents a barrel from 8 cents a barrel.

Democrats had also modified the investment fund managers' tax, called carried interest, to address concerns voiced by some Senators. The provision would tax 75 percent of investment fund managers income at ordinary tax rates, with an exception for assets held at least 5 years, of which only 50 percent would be taxed at ordinary income rates.

Fund managers currently pay low 15 percent capital gains taxes on much of their earnings.

Democrats had also revised a measure dealing with small business taxes in hopes of winning support from Senator Olympia Snowe. But Snowe joined her fellow Republicans in voting against the bill.

(Reporting by Donna Smith; editing by Anthony Boadle)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (10)
HilaryLo wrote:
The private sector is not going to get us out of this recession. The whole aim of the private sector is efficiency, in other words, NOT spending money. Private businesses are penny-pinching cheapskates. Do you think it’s a coincidence that profitable industries (food, health, defense, banks, oil) are industries that the government subsidizes, either through direct purchase or tax-subsidies? The purchasing-power of the stingy-ass private sector is nil. The purchasing-power of Americans has evaporated too now that “consumers” (aka WORKERS) barely earn enough to keep roofs over their heads. If we “stimulate” the private sector through government contracts, what makes you think consumers/workers will see any of that money? What makes you think employers won’t pocket it, while just forcing their employees to work harder? We need a federal jobs program. I trust the government (you and me) to administer the recovery.

Jun 17, 2010 10:28pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Markness wrote:
HilaryLo, your failure of economics depresses me.

Jun 17, 2010 11:35pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
borisjimbo wrote:
I have a small question for those who think it’s OK for a 60 vote majority to be necessary for anything to proceed in the Senate. If a 60 vote majority is needed, would you please explain why the drafters of the Constitution gave the vice president a vote in the Senate but only in the case of a 50:50 tie?

Jun 18, 2010 1:20am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.