U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

Justice still reviewing Arizona immigration law

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Thu Jun 17, 2010 9:55pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Justice Department is still reviewing a possible challenge to the controversial Arizona immigration law, a spokesman said on Thursday, despite a statement last week by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that a lawsuit to challenge it would be pursued.

Clinton said in a television interview in Ecuador on June 8 that President Barack Obama had ordered the Justice Department to challenge the Arizona law because he did not believe states should set immigration policies, which could differ.

"President Obama has spoken out against the law because he thinks that the federal government should be determining immigration policy," she said according to a transcript posted on the State Department website.

"And the Justice Department, under his direction, will be bringing a lawsuit against the act," she told NTN24, which is headquartered in Colombia.

Both the White House and Justice Department declined to confirm or deny the presidential directive.

"The department continues to review the law," said Justice Department spokesman Matthew Miller.

A State Department spokesman did not try to retract Clinton's remark and noted the issue had been a concern on her trip.

"I defer to the Department of Justice on what legal steps are available," said spokesman P.J. Crowley. "The president and secretary have said clearly that the administration opposes the Arizona law."

The Arizona law is an effort to stop the state from serving as a principal corridor for illegal immigrants to enter the country from Mexico, and from being a busy entry point for Mexican cartels smuggling drugs to a voracious U.S. market.

The law, set to take effect next month, would require officers to determine the immigration status of any person they suspect of being in the country illegally.

Critics, including top Obama administration officials, have said it could effectively permit racial profiling and may be unconstitutional.

REBUKE FROM ARIZONA GOVERNOR

The news of Clinton's remarks drew a rebuke by Arizona Governor Jan Brewer, who has been a proponent of the state law and met recently with Obama to discuss her concerns about border security.

"To learn of this lawsuit through an Ecuadorean interview with the Secretary of State is just outrageous," she said in a statement. "If our own government intends to sue our state to prevent illegal immigration enforcement, the least it can do is inform us before it informs the citizens of another nation."

Until Clinton's remarks, officials had said only that they had concerns about the law and were looking at their options, which included a legal challenge. About 10.8 million illegal immigrants are believed to be in the United States.

The fight over the law has jump-started efforts in Washington to pass a comprehensive reform bill to address illegal immigration. But it was unclear whether Congress would approve a law in a year when many face re-election bids.

Obama said last month he would seek an additional $500 million for border security and send up to 1,200 National Guard troops to the U.S.-Mexican border. Brewer said in her statement she had yet to receive any information about those plans despite a pledge to provide it.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (17)
lenardra wrote:
In other country’s an illegal immigrant would be shot crossing the border. In any other country they would take care of its citizens before those of another country. America needs to address its own problems. Our government continues to strip us of our constitutional rights, using the constitution and changing it to as they see fit to reach their goals. Yet again the government continues to oversteps its authority. It is not allowed to interfere with state unless there is a conflict between states. What a hypocrite, Obama wants to say it is unconstitutional only when it suits him. Sounds like he should take the time to read it. It is supposed to guarantee our rights as a nation. it was not meant to be changed as the government sees fit. I would like to see the government try to take away my guns. I will give it to them one bullet at a time.

Jun 17, 2010 10:54pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
JKHamlin wrote:
So apparently they’re having a tough time finding someone in the administration who reads above a third grade level to interpret it to everyone.

Since when do Democrats care about the Constitution? Obamacare violated the Constitution in more ways than anything in the whole history of the country.

Jun 18, 2010 2:02am EDT  --  Report as abuse
MekhongKurt wrote:
lenardra, were you as virulently opposed when President Bush tried to reform our immigration laws, including a path to citizenship for illegals? If you did, though I disagree with you, then I salute you — I mean that — for consistency. On the other hand, if you did *not* object equally strenuously to President Bush’s failed efforts, then your objection to President Obama’s views are hypocritical.

Also, would you please travel to Washington to lead a seminar on the precise meaning of the Constitution, something the finest legal minds in the country have been debating since before the ink was even dry on the original? Since you clearly have all the answers, provide them the wisdom of your counsel.

Jun 18, 2010 2:22am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.