Senate restores Medicare pay for doctors

WASHINGTON | Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:55pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Senate agreed on Friday to rescind a 21 percent pay cut that went into effect earlier this month for doctors treating patients under the Medicare health program for the elderly.

The Senate agreed unanimously to restore Medicare payments with a 2.2 percent increase and to delay any further pay cuts for six months. The Senate acted on Medicare payments after a broader tax bill that would have temporarily stopped the pay cut failed on a procedural vote late on Thursday.

"The doctors will be paid. Seniors will get the benefits they deserve," said Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus.

He said he hoped senators will work out other disputes over the broader tax bill that also would extend unemployment benefits for hundreds of thousands of jobless workers whose benefits ran out last month.

That bill also would renew a set of popular business tax breaks and would pay for it in part by raising taxes on investment fund managers who now enjoy a low 15 percent capital gains rate on their earnings.

The Senate approved the six-month pay fix for Medicare doctors after Democratic and Republican leaders agreed to fully offset the $6.4 billion cost. The offsets include a hospital claims adjustment provision and a measure that gives companies some pension funding relief.

It also raises money by clearing the way for more cooperation between the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which oversees the government healthcare programs, and the Internal Revenue Service on tax debt and Medicare reimbursements.

"I think we've come up with a proposal that achieves a goal that both sides wanted to achieve, which was to get a doctor fix for at least a six-month period of time and also it is paid for," said Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell.

The $1.4 trillion budget deficit and $13 trillion debt are major issues heading into the November congressional elections and lawmakers are balking at adding to the flow of red ink.

The Medicare payment fix has to be approved by the House of Representatives before it can go into effect.

Doctors are pushing for a permanent update to the Medicare payment system. For years, Congress has avoided a permanent fix because it would add billions to the budget deficit outlook. But lawmakers do not want doctors turning away elderly patients so they have been enacting a series of temporary "fixes" to the Medicare payment system to prevent steep pay cuts.

(Reporting by Donna Smith; Editing by Chris Wilson)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
TomMariner wrote:
I know it is a coincidence, but the date when the draconian cuts (which were voted in with the “healthcare reform”) will now kick in is weeks after the 2010 elections. I know it is not the intent, but those who rushed through a vote on killing Medicare can now say, “no we didn’t”.

Something as vital as our health would never be used for crass political means.

Jun 18, 2010 8:08pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Storyburn_has wrote:
If Obamacare is truly going to work, health insurers are going to have to become non profit

Jun 18, 2010 8:58pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
plainer wrote:
This is a problem. Medicare premiums require an increase to prevent the reduction in service fees as one of the measures toward a permanent fix. The HC Bill played no part in the reduction. Congress already passed a bill in the 90’s to reduce provider fees but deferred enactment for the very same reason they did this year. HC was only a catalyst in addressing its enactment. Seniors eventually will expect to co-pay the difference eventually.

Jun 19, 2010 9:44am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.