U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

Gates sees progress in Afghan war

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Sun Jun 20, 2010 11:50am EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S.-led forces are making progress against insurgents in Afghanistan despite significant casualties and concerns about the quality of Afghan troops, U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said on Sunday.

Gates told the "Fox News Sunday" program that U.S. General Stanley McChrystal and other military leaders are confident that the campaign against Taliban insurgents, particularly in southern Afghanistan, is moving in the right direction.

McChrystal is the top U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan.

"It is a tough pull and we are suffering significant casualties," Gates said, adding that the Pentagon had expected a fierce battle in the southern city of Kandahar and other Taliban-controlled areas.

"He (McChrystal) is confident he will be able to demonstrate by December that not only do we have the right strategy but that we are making progress," Gates said.

The U.S. defense secretary, however, said it was too early to be able to say how many U.S. troops would be withdrawn from Afghanistan and how quickly they would leave when a planned drawdown began in July 2011.

"That absolutely has not been decided," Gates said.

President Barack Obama decided in December to send 30,000 additional troops to Afghanistan as part of a revised strategy that focuses on securing Kandahar, the Taliban's birthplace, to try to turn the tide in the nearly nine-year-old war.

Obama also announced the July 2011 date for the gradual withdrawal of troops. Transferring responsibility for security to Afghan troops in certain parts of the country is one of the linchpins of the Obama strategy.

But doubts remain that Afghan troops will be able to assert control if given broader authority next year -- recent reports have suggested that Kabul's army is poorly trained and suffers high rates of desertion.

Some top military officials have said privately that they doubt they will really know if the war strategy is working or not until next summer, around the time Obama plans to begin a troop withdrawal, conditions permitting.

White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel told ABC's "This Week" program that the July 2011 drawdown date was "firm," adding that Washington was seeing signs that the Afghan government was making headway on security.

"We are now at that point in Afghanistan, and in fact for the first time in eight years, nine years, they're actually meeting their police recruitment requirements as well as their army recruitment requirements," he said in an interview aired on Sunday.

Gates said he was confident that Afghan troops would be ready to take over primary responsibility for security in some parts of Afghanistan.

(Writing by Paul Simao, Editing by Will Dunham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
STORYBURNnice wrote:
We cannot win this war, only push the Taliban around and Gates knows this

Jun 20, 2010 9:37pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
OKJ1 wrote:
Oh yes…and the reason that the United States can now never afford to pull up stakes in either Afghanistan or Iraq has an historical foundation as well.

The United States simply cannot afford to have another major power backfill behind them, and in the end exploit either region’s natural resources, e.g., as China is presently doing elsewhere.

Note that we refer to Afghanistan and Iraq as regions. Historically (again) neither have ever really been a “country” in the traditional sense of the word. OKJGp

Jun 20, 2010 10:35pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
ChichiriMuyo wrote:
If they are finally meeting their recruitment numbers, does that mean the deserters are going back for another round of free guns to steal away to the Taliban’s side? We’re not winning this war, no matter how long we stay or what we do.

Jun 21, 2010 4:12am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.