Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Best of Cannes

Style and scenes from the Cannes Film Festival.  Slideshow 

Photo

Ethiopia's salt trails

For centuries merchants have traveled to Ethiopia to collect salt from the surface of the vast desert basin.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Shot grizzly tied to hiker death near Yellowstone

Related Topics

A grizzly bear walks on snow near Obsidian Creek in the Yellowstone National Park in this photo taken in April 2003. REUTERS/Jim Peaco/National Park Service

A grizzly bear walks on snow near Obsidian Creek in the Yellowstone National Park in this photo taken in April 2003.

Credit: Reuters/Jim Peaco/National Park Service

CODY, Wyoming | Sun Jun 20, 2010 4:59pm EDT

CODY, Wyoming (Reuters) - Authorities in northwest Wyoming have shot and killed a grizzly bear they say mauled an elderly hiker to death near Yellowstone National Park.

Erwin Frank Evert, 70, was found dead on Thursday in the Kitty Creek area, about 7 miles east of Yellowstone, a popular U.S. tourist spot, famous for its Old Faithful Geyser.

Tests of genetic material found on Evert matched blood taken from the bear, said Chris Servheen, grizzly bear coordinator for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Officials used a helicopter and radio tracking gear to locate and shoot the bear on Saturday morning, after making several unsuccessful attempts to catch it.

The incident is the first fatal mauling by a grizzly bear in the area in some 25 years.

"We try to do everything we can to minimize the risks. But we can't protect ourselves against people that ignore every warning we give, and we can't protect people against themselves," said Servheen.

"The whole thing is regrettable; just one tragedy followed by another," he added.

Evert, a botanist from Park Ridge, Illinois, had spent summers with his wife at their Kitty Creek cabin for the past 30 years. He was hiking alone at the time of the attack.

(Reporting by Ruffin Prevost; Writing by Dana Ford, Editing by Sandra Maler)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (10)
curtisdacrab wrote:
we are so quick to execute animals that kill, something it must do to survive.
yet we keep human killers alive for years and decades. why? if the proof is there what
is the difference? think of the money states could save. oh wait, saving money by states or federal governments isn’t something desirable.

Jun 20, 2010 5:43pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
JerryStevens wrote:
“We try to do everything we can to minimize the risks. But we can’t protect ourselves against people that ignore every warning we give, and we can’t protect people against themselves,” said Servheen.”

Then why did you shoot the grizzly? Bears will be bears.

Jun 20, 2010 5:45pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
PNUT wrote:
I don’t see any reason to kill the bear, unless they were afraid he’d picked up a new habit of mauling people, although one isn’t a habit. It sounds like the guy had a bit a cranial-rectal inversion ,that there had been warnings and he went out anyway.

Jun 20, 2010 6:06pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.