Nebraska town latest to fight illegal immigrants

Related Topics

KANSAS CITY, Mo | Tue Jun 22, 2010 1:07am EDT

KANSAS CITY, Mo (Reuters) - Voters in a small Nebraska town on Monday added to an anti-immigration sentiment sweeping parts of the United States, voting to ban the hiring or renting of property to illegal immigrants.

An estimated 57 percent of voters in the eastern Nebraska community of Fremont voted in favor of the ban, according to unofficial results of the referendum in the town of about 25,000 people.

Supporters of the measure said it was needed to compensate for a lack of federal law enforcement of immigration violations, but opponents said the law could fuel discrimination and threatened litigation if it passed.

Potential renters would need to apply for a license, and through the application process Fremont officials could check to see if the prospective renters had legal status.

Also, the ordinance requires businesses to verify employees have legal status to work.

The move in Nebraska highlights the deep rift over immigration ahead of congressional elections this November.

It comes on the heels of passage of an Arizona law that requires state and local police to determine the status of people if there is "reasonable suspicion" that they are illegal immigrants, and to arrest those who are unable to provide documents proving they are in the country legally.

The Arizona measure, which also makes it a crime to transport someone who is an illegal immigrant and to hire day laborers off the street, is widely considered the toughest measure taken by any U.S. state to curb illegal immigration.

The Obama administration has said it will challenge the Arizona measure.

(Reporting by Carey Gillam, editing by Vicki Allen)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (49)
ARealRealist wrote:
Finally, America is fighting back.

Go, Fremont!

Secure the border. No amnesty. Support Arizona (& Fremont, Nebraska!)

Jun 22, 2010 1:04am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Jack956 wrote:
Those who decry high immigration levels, yet vote to de-fund foreign contraception aid for “moral” reasons, are at odds with their own purposes. Rich nations are taking resources (like oil and minerals) from poor nations, yet expecting them to not yearn for the shared benefits of said takings. This issue should be made into one of global overpopulation and carrying-capacity, not just us vs. them and stolen jobs.

Jun 22, 2010 1:12am EDT  --  Report as abuse
AceHighSteve wrote:
Mexico has tougher standards of entering their country, but have the gall to speak out against the US?? What a Crock!!1

Jun 22, 2010 1:19am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.