Mexico backs case against Arizona immigration law

MEXICO CITY Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:33pm EDT

Related Topics

MEXICO CITY (Reuters) - Mexico joined a legal challenge to Arizona's controversial new immigration law on Tuesday, arguing that the measure is unconstitutional and would harm bilateral relations with the United States.

The Arizona law, which takes effect on July 29, makes it a crime to be in the state illegally. It requires state and local police, during lawful contact, to determine the immigration status of any person they suspect is in the country illegally.

It has been challenged in five separate lawsuits filed in federal courts in Arizona by civil rights and religious groups as well as two local police officers. Plaintiffs say the law is unconstitutional and a mandate for racial profiling.

In a legal brief supporting one of the lawsuits, Mexico argued that the measure is unconstitutional and "raises substantial challenges to the bilateral diplomatic relations between Mexico and the U.S."

More than 20 million Mexican workers, tourists and students were lawfully allowed into the United States throughout 2009, said the brief, and the government is worried Mexicans will be discriminated against because of racial profiling.

"Mexico is gravely concerned that (Arizona's law) will lead to ... detentions of Mexican citizens without regard to whether they have taken any actions or exhibited any behavior indicating they are guilty of a crime," the brief said.

U.S. President Barack Obama has also criticized the law and the U.S. Justice Department is reviewing whether or not it will raise its own challenge.

Polls show the state law is backed by a solid majority of American voters, many who fear increasing drug trafficking and human smuggling over the U.S.-Mexico border.

(Reporting by Mica Rosenberg and Anahi Rama in Mexico City and Tim Gaynor in Phoenix; Editing by Bill Trott)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (21)
jtf49 wrote:
I have to show a passport if I go 20 miles into mexico . they should do the same papers are paper passport or visa

Jun 22, 2010 7:12pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Northforker wrote:
The DOJ should sue the Mexican government over their law violating caucasion and black rights. OR better yet, we should adopt the mexican immigration law, let them sue us over that.

Jun 22, 2010 7:25pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
shayneedward wrote:
Oh please! When are the head-in-the-sand Democrats going wake up and smell the abuse! The Mexican government is opposed to a law that will lead to the deportation of illegal (mainly) Mexicans back to Mexico. I work in an industry chock full of illegals, and all the ones I have talked to are sending money back home to Mexico, etc. This means an influx of strong US dollars into Mexico, and more $$$ for the Mexican government.

Don’t get me wrong; I’ve never met a latino/ latina I didn’t like (ok, just one Chilean out of hundreds I know) but being likable does not give them the right to be in this country illegally. If they want to do as I have done and go through a legal immigration process, that’s great. But jeez, don’t give them a pass because they jumped past the line, over the fence, and are already at the concession stand while the rest of us are still waiting at the back of the line.

Jun 22, 2010 7:34pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus