U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

More evidence that secondhand smoke can kill

Related Topics

NEW YORK | Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:44pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - People who breathe in a lot of other people's tobacco smoke are twice as likely to die from heart disease as those exposed to lower levels of "secondhand" smoke, a new study suggests.

The findings add to the growing body of evidence linking secondhand smoke to cardiovascular disease, Dr. Steven Schroeder, director of the Smoking Cessation Leadership Center at the University of California, San Francisco, who was not involved with the study, told Reuters Health.

In the study, Dr. Mark Hamer of University College London, UK, and colleagues used a saliva test that is able to measure the amount of secondhand smoke people have been exposed to. They gave this test to over 13,000 people in England and Scotland and then followed them for an average of 8 years, keeping track of who developed heart disease and who died.

Over the course of the study, 32 out of about 1,500 people who had never smoked but were exposed to high levels of secondhand smoke died of heart disease, compared to 15 out of about 1,000 "never-smokers" with low exposure.

In analyses restricted to never-smokers, high secondhand smoke exposure was associated with more than a two-fold increased risk of dying from heart disease.

A "high" level of exposure, Hamer explained, would be equivalent to living with a smoker and getting exposed to secondhand smoke pretty much every day. About 1 in 5 of the people in the study had high exposure levels, according to the saliva test.

People exposed to a lot of secondhand smoke, as well as smokers themselves, were younger and more likely to be male, worse off financially, and less physically active than people with low exposure. But even when controlling for these potentially confounding factors, the link between secondhand smoke exposure and heart disease remained.

The study is published in the latest issue of the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

Hamer's team also found evidence, as have other research teams, that secondhand smoke triggers inflammation in the body, a known risk factor for heart disease.

"Even though the biological mechanisms are not fully understood yet, there's growing evidence that indicates that exposure to fine particles (such as those in cigarette smoke)...results in this low to moderate inflammation," Dr. C. Arden Pope III, an economist and environmental epidemiologist at Brigham Young University in Provo, Utah, told Reuters Health.

Pope, who was not involved in the study, said: "There's a fairly substantial literature now that indicates that secondhand smoke is associated with cardiovascular disease. "This study...certainly contributes to our knowledge."

SOURCE: link.reuters.com/tew43m JACC/Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2010, online June 21, 2010.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
ohiobarowner wrote:
Laughable. MORE evidence? You mean like the heart attack studies that have all been exposed for the fraud that they are? Heart attacks HAVE been decreasing prior to any smoking bans (since 1964 with the exception of 2 years) but they only show the years after a smoking ban. And Steven Schroeder with the Smoking CESSATION Leadership Center validates this? Schroeder is the former CEO of Johnson & Johnson’s PROFITABLE “non” profit, Robert Wood Johnson. They gave Schroeder $10,000,000 for this “cessation” center. So who SELLS the CESSATION products? Why, Johnson & Johnson, of course. And RWJF owns 42,343,491 shares of J&J stock. This is all about moving people over to big pHARMa’s addictive nicotine. The patches have a 98.4% FAILURE RATE. http://www.bmj.com/cgi/eletters/338/apr02_3/b1024 (read Dr. Siegel’s comments). The gum is MORE ADDICTIVE than cigarettes and it’s harmful. http://www.askapatient.com/viewrating.asp?drug=18612&name=NICORETTE&page=1 Have you seen Jessica Simpson’s interview on Jay Leno? http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/28/jessica-simpson-talks-dat_n_554924.html WATCH THE VIDEO. RWJF has given over HALF A BILLION DOLLARS IN TAX FREE GRANTS for the ultimate goal of smoking bans. Considering they sell 1,000,000 boxes a month (with insurance companies, the government, states, Medicaid/Medicare footing the bill) that’s not a bad investment for the return-on-investmant. Read more here: http://www.jpands.org/vol15no2/correspondence.pdf (read “smoking bans” and “private foundations”)

It’s not science, folks. It’s a marketing scam.

Jun 22, 2010 9:03pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
marbee wrote:
I sure wish these so-called “studies” had to pass in a court of law! They would be shredded.

Jun 22, 2010 9:21pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
harleyrider wrote:
Judged:

1

1

1
http://www.drkaslow.com/html/fibrinogen.html

No drug (with the possible exception of estrogen) or lifestyle change is known to significantly alter fibrinogen levels, although quitting smoking does result in slight reductions in fibrinogen levels. However, for those of us who don’t smoke, there has been little, if any, advice which could be given to lower fibrinogen from the conventional medical approach.

can we say bingo…….the nazis study just debunked……

http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/abs…

Methods: In a prospective study of 13,443 participants living in England and Scotland (age 53.5 ± 12.6 years, 52.3% women), we measured salivary cotinine (an objective marker of SHS exposure) and novel CVD biomarkers (C-reactive protein, fibrinogen) at baseline

Jun 24, 2010 12:48pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.