U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

Q+A: What does Petraeus bring to Afghan war effort?

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Wed Jun 23, 2010 2:52pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The choice of General David Petraeus to replace disgraced commander Stanley McChrystal ensures that President Barack Obama's 6-month-old war strategy will be executed as planned without interruption.

WHY PETRAEUS?

Petraeus, credited with salvaging the U.S. war in Iraq, has enormous credibility in Washington and has been deeply involved in shaping Afghan war strategy as the head of U.S. Central Command. There is perhaps no one in the U.S. military with more star power than Petraeus, an asset that could prove indispensable in fending off growing doubts about the war.

WHAT DOES IT MEAN FOR OBAMA'S STRATEGY?

Petraeus firmly believes the strategy in place to reverse Taliban momentum is the right one.

Widely seen as the father of modern counterinsurgency (COIN) doctrine, he oversaw development of the COIN field manual on which Obama's revised Afghan war strategy was based.

WHAT DOES IT MEAN ON THE GROUND?

No one was as immersed in the details of U.S. military plans as McChrystal, but Petraeus has overseen the effort, including planning for a major campaign to secure the Taliban birthplace of Kandahar, which is getting under way more slowly than planned.

Petraeus was a frequent visitor to the region who has built strong relations not just with the Afghan government but with authorities in neighboring Pakistan whose support is critical to the war effort.

Petraeus has been a strong advocate of pairing counterinsurgency principles with aggressive use of U.S. special operations forces.

WHAT'S PETRAEUS'S OUTLOOK ON THE WAR?

Petraeus has been careful in his public statements about not raising expectations for turning the tide quickly in Afghanistan, stressing the road ahead would be long and hard.

In testimony this month to a Senate committee, Petraeus said counterinsurgency operations amounted to a "rollercoaster experience."

"There are setbacks as well as areas of progress or successes. It is truly an up and down when you're living it, when you're doing it even from afar, frankly. But their trajectory, in my view, has generally been upwards despite the tough losses, despite the setbacks," he said.

HOW ARE HIS RELATIONS WITH THE WHITE HOUSE?

Petraeus runs a tight ship, believes strongly in adhering to the chain of command, and does not tolerate the kind of backbiting that brought down McChrystal, aides say.

He has made clear in testimony that while he will offer his candid military advice to the president in private, he will firmly support whatever decision the commander-in-chief makes.

(Reporting by Adam Entous and Phil Stewart; editing by Patricia Wilson and Doina Chiacu)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (14)
Rexter wrote:
Why Petraeus? Because he is a servile bureaucrat.

Jun 24, 2010 9:00am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Rexter, the article above provides plenty of concrete reasons to support this change. Don’t feed into the Fox News lies & slander. I for one think it was a great choice by Obama, and it showed the decisiveness people often call for from him. I hope he can take this momentum into the Wall Street Reform fight & the Gulf Recovery.

Jun 24, 2010 10:03am EDT  --  Report as abuse
TZAZ wrote:
Petraeus should have declined based solely on the fact that this president and vice air head Biden literally called him a liar during the surge.I have to agree with Lefty Rexter, Petraeus is a servile bureaucrat if not a masochist.

Jun 24, 2010 10:48am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.