U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

Sanctions probably won't dissuade Iran: CIA chief

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Sun Jun 27, 2010 1:53pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Targeted economic sanctions on Iran probably will not deter Tehran from seeking a nuclear capability, CIA chief Leon Panetta said on Sunday.

Urged on by the Obama administration, the U.N. Security Council this month passed a resolution to impose new sanctions on Iran over its nuclear development. New sanctions also were agreed on by the European Union and the U.S. Congress.

Western nations say Iran's nuclear work is aimed at building atomic weapons but Tehran says the program is for civilian energy use.

In an interview with ABC's "This Week" program, Panetta said the new sanctions could create serious economic problems and help weaken the Tehran government.

"Will it deter them (Iran) from their ambitions with regards to nuclear capability? Probably not," he said, adding that Iran was continuing to develop its nuclear know-how.

The United States believes Iran has enough low-enriched uranium now for two weapons but Iran would have to enrich it first, the Central Intelligence Agency director said.

"And we would estimate that if they made that decision, it would probably take a year to get there, probably another year to develop the kind of weapons delivery system in order to make that viable," Panetta said.

He said Israel felt more strongly than Washington that Iran had already made a decision to proceed with the bomb but Israel was willing to wait and see what the impact of the new sanctions will be. Neither the United States nor Israel has ruled out a military option to stop Tehran from getting the bomb.

"I think they (Israel) are willing to give us the room to be able to try to change Iran diplomatically and culturally and politically as opposed to changing them militarily," he said.

(Editing by Bill Trott)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
STORYBURNcool wrote:
Gee, you think!?? Sanctions have never worked before in the Middle East, what’s so magical this go around?

Jun 27, 2010 4:18pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
irwinsteffy wrote:
The pawns are all in place (our troops), surrounding another “WMD THREAT”, to be sacrificed for our masters whenever they fire the starting pistol to commence possibly World War III. But, hey, its OK, all is well.

Jun 27, 2010 8:12pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Pedro07 wrote:
Would you be dissuaded to get nukes if your worst enemy had them? Why is Israel allowed to have them? Why are there no UN sanctions against Israel? What a joke the UN is…

Jun 27, 2010 12:52am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.