N.Korea rejects U.N. truce talks over ship sinking

SEOUL | Sun Jun 27, 2010 7:40am EDT

SEOUL (Reuters) - North Korea said on Sunday it was ready for direct military talk with South Korea to discuss the sinking of one of Seoul's warships, but only if the armistice commission overseeing the Korean War truce does not get involved.

South Korea has accused the North of sinking the Cheonan, and killing 46 sailors, after a multinational investigation concluded that a North Korean submarine had torpedoed the corvette, an incident that has ratcheted up tensions on the peninsula.

North Korea has denied involvement, saying the investigation was a fabrication. It has also threatened military action if it is punished by the United Nations for the incident.

South Korea said this week it has not given up on trying to persuade the U.N. Security Council to adopt a resolution against North Korea over the navy ship's sinking.

"If the South Korean authorities respond to our proposal, we will promptly come out for a working contact for the opening of the military talks," the North's official KCNA news agency said.

"The U.S. forces side should no longer meddle in the issue of the North-South relations under the name of the 'UN Forces Command'," it said.

A multinational team from the U.S.-led United Nations Command is probing whether North Korea violated the Korean War armistice by sinking the Cheonan, a probe the North has denounced as a "bogus mechanism."

North Korea's military has proposed sending a team of military inspectors to review the multinational investigation into the Cheonan's sinking, but South Korea has rejected that call and demanded the North make an unconditional apology and a pledge to end provocations.

President Barack Obama said after meeting South Korean President Lee Myung-bak on the sidelines of the Group of 20 leaders in Toronto that the North will face consequences for the incident, pressing for a Security Council condemnation.

(Reporting by Jack Kim, editing by Miral Fahmy)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
wareagleone wrote:
I will applaud a SCOTUS affirming gun rights,however, the real threat to our freedoms comes from government secrecy and disregard for civil liberties.

Jun 27, 2010 10:32am EDT  --  Report as abuse
randalmarlin wrote:
What kind of justice is it when an accused (North Korea) is not allowed to see the evidence?

Jun 27, 2010 1:07pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Tamooj wrote:
RandalMarlin – Don’t be silly; all the evidence was openly submitted to the UN, and a multinational investigation looked at it all very carefully and skeptically They unanimously found it be conclusive proof that the DPRK (North Korea) was to blame.

The DPRK is now asking for private access to the evidence and talks that exclude nations they can’t intimidate. I don’t think most courts allow any accused attacked to have private access to the evidence against them or private meetings with the victim. They always behave just like an angry child who needs attention in order to stay in control. Threatening military violence if they are chastised for any wrong-doing? Please. China has been far too indulgent with their spoiled child simply because the DPRK is a useful tool to utilize against the ROK/Japan/US. If China wishes to be seen as a responsible adult actor on the world stage, they need to step in and firmly clean up the DPRK mess once and for all. They are too in love with playing long-term strategic games that favor only their own interests at the expense of tranquility and prosperity for everyone.

Jun 27, 2010 2:58pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.