House passes landmark financial reform bill

WASHINGTON Wed Jun 30, 2010 7:50pm EDT

House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank talks with a group including Ranking Member Spencer Bachus (R-AL) (L) during a recess from a committee conference on Wall Street reform to hammer out sweeping changes in financial regulation legislation on Capitol Hill, June 24, 2010. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank talks with a group including Ranking Member Spencer Bachus (R-AL) (L) during a recess from a committee conference on Wall Street reform to hammer out sweeping changes in financial regulation legislation on Capitol Hill, June 24, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Jonathan Ernst

Related Video

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. House of Representatives on Wednesday approved a landmark overhaul of financial regulations but the Senate put off action until mid-July, delaying a final victory for President Barack Obama.

Still, the 237 to 192 vote in the House marked a win for Obama and his fellow Democrats, who have made the most sweeping rewrite of Wall Street rules since the 1930s a top priority in the wake of the 2007-2009 financial crisis.

"That's why we are here today, to make sure that never happens again," House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said. "We will pass the toughest set of Wall Street reforms in generations."

Analysts say Obama is all but certain to get the measure on his desk eventually, but Democrats' hopes of sending a bill to him to sign into law by the July 4 Independence Day holiday were dashed.

The death of Democratic Senator Robert Byrd and cold feet among Republican allies has complicated efforts to round up the votes needed in the Senate. A week-long break following the July 4 Independence Day holiday means the Senate won't act until the week of July 12, at the earliest.

The bill would impose tighter regulations on financial firms and reduce their profits. It would boost consumer protections, force banks to reduce risky trading and investing activities and set up a new government process for liquidating troubled financial firms.

With congressional elections approaching in November, Democrats have ridden a wave of public disgust at an industry that has awarded itself fat paydays while the rest of the country struggles with high unemployment.

Wall Street and Republicans have tried to delay the bill or lessen its reach, but the measure has actually gotten tougher during its year-long journey through Congress.

Republicans say the bill would hurt the economy by burdening businesses with a thicket of new regulations. They also point out that it ducks the question of how to handle troubled mortgage finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which Democrats plan to tackle next year.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which own or guarantee half of all U.S. mortgages, have received a total of about $145 billion in taxpayer bailouts since being seized by the government in September 2008. Their regulator has said he does not know how much more taxpayer support they will need.

"All this bill before us does is perpetuate the same dumb regulation that got us into this financial pickle in the first place," said Republican Representative Jeb Hensarling.

Democrats have seized the opportunity to link their political foes with an unpopular industry. Obama on Wednesday accused Republicans of being out of touch with the American people for opposing reforms, and others echoed his line of attack on the House floor.

"Republicans have sided with big Wall Street banks at every opportunity," said Democratic Representative Luis Guitierrez. "If it helps Wall Street banks, they favor it, but if it helps Main Street and regular Americans, they won't vote for it."

SCRAMBLING IN THE SENATE

As Democrats marched to victory in the House, their colleagues in the Senate scrambled for votes.

Byrd's death left Democrats one vote shy of the 60 needed to overcome procedural hurdles in the 100-seat chamber, and Democrats have yet to nail down support from Republican moderates whose votes will be needed to advance the bill.

Those Republicans -- Susan Collins, Olympia Snowe and Scott Brown -- had voted for an earlier version, but they objected to a $17.9 billion tax on large financial institutions that was added last week to cover the bill's costs.

Democrats stripped out the tax in a last-minute negotiating session on Tuesday to address their concern. All three moderates said they were still studying the final bill before deciding how to vote.

Collins said she was inclined to support it, while Snowe said it was a "possibility" that she could vote for it.

"We're just trying to work it out and I am sure we will be able to, but it's important to get it right," Snowe said.

Brown, who won significant concessions earlier in the process, also declined to say how he would vote.

"It's morphed into something different than it began with and I think it's appropriate to read it," he said of the 2,000-plus page bill.

Democrats could also pick up needed support from their own side of the aisle. Maria Cantwell, one of two Democrats who voted against the bill earlier, said she might reconsider.

Democrat Christopher Dodd, the bill's chief advocate in the Senate, said lawmakers should not vote against it just because they don't like one or two elements.

"No one's going to get everything they want in this bill, I certainly didn't," he said. "I've done everything I know how to do to accommodate my colleagues to make this as fair, as balanced, as thoughtful as I possibly could."

Representative Barney Frank, the Democrat who has overseen the bill in the House, said he would try to revive that tax on banks in separate legislation.

Even after Obama signs the bill into law, its final impact will remain unclear for several years while regulators work to put it into effect. Congress also could pass another bill to fix technical mistakes in the legislative language, said an aide to Frank.

(Additional reporting by Corbett B. Daly, Rachelle Younglai and Donna Smith; Editing by Leslie Adler)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (22)
STORYBURNcool wrote:
I can’t believe Congress has matched the EU’s 50% tax rate on banker bonuses

Jun 29, 2010 9:51pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
savory wrote:
“Oh, we’re Democrats, we better fold and stay spineless if anyone even hints that something is controversial that we want to put forward! We don’t know how to stand ou=n our own two feet! We need our mommies to hold our hands while we walk around the schoolyard trying desperately to be liked!” Take a page from the Republicans, and grow a pair. Can’t the Dems EVER get over their fear of being full-fledged adults?

Jun 29, 2010 10:19pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
dennisaa wrote:
They again caved into the pressures of Republicans showing NO backbone at all!

Who runs the country, Republicans, the banks and Wall Street? Looks like it to me.

Jun 29, 2010 10:23pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Recommended Newsletters

Reuters U.S. Top News
A quick-fix on the day's news published with Reuters videos and award-winning news photography and delivered at your choice of one of four times during the day.
Reuters Deals Today
The latest Reuters articles on M&A, IPOs, private equity, hedge funds and regulatory updates delivered to your inbox each day.
Reuters Technology Report
Your daily briefing on the latest tech developments from around the world from Reuters expert tech correspondents.