U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

Senate panel votes to end oil spill liability cap

WASHINGTON | Wed Jun 30, 2010 5:50pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Congress on Wednesday took major steps to rein in Big Oil's offshore drilling practices, as one Senate panel voted to lift all caps on liability in oil spills and another moved to deny offshore leases to companies with poor track records.

The action on Capitol Hill comes 72 days after an explosion involving a BP oil rig, which has left millions of gallons of oil pouring into the Gulf of Mexico from a ruptured deep-water well.

Action kicked off on Wednesday in the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, where Democrats pushed through a bill eliminating the $75 million cap on liability that oil companies currently enjoy for damages from offshore spills, like the one devastating the U.S. Gulf coast.

The committee's vote would open the oil industry to potentially unlimited compensation for economic losses suffered by local businesses and communities and for damages to natural resources.

The change, if approved and made law, would apply retroactively to BP Plc's massive Gulf of Mexico spill, although the company has already said it would cover all costs, which will run into the billions of dollars.

As the environment panel worked on its legislation, the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee approved a separate bill to tighten rules on offshore oil drilling projects.

It would increase civil and criminal penalties on the industry for illegal practices and would tie those penalties to inflation. Notably, it also would limit lease sales to companies with good track records -- a move that could hurt future operations for companies like BP.

The panel's legislation also ratchets up safety requirements, such as mandating redundant blow-out preventers for wells and additional permits for deepwater projects.

On the other side of Capitol Hill, Democratic Representative George Miller said he will offer legislation in the House to deny BP new offshore oil and gas drilling leases for up to seven years because of its "extensive record" of worker safety and environmental violations.

Miller is a close confidant of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and chairs the House Education and Labor Committee. Drew Hammill, a spokesman for Pelosi, said she has not yet reviewed the details of Miller's bill "but shares his concerns about BP's poor record."

While lawmakers in both the Senate and House of Representatives have made the liability legislation a top priority following the BP spill, a senior Democrat, Senator Max Baucus, expressed reservations about imposing unlimited liability on the oil industry.

Before the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee approved its bill, Baucus said that a $10 billion cap that had been kicked around in May, "made some sense to me" and he questioned whether the removal of all caps would hurt some U.S. firms while helping foreign ones.

It was unclear whether Baucus would try to amend the bill later in the legislative process.

The liability and offshore drilling safety bills could be combined with other energy and environmental measures being queued up for passage as early as next month, or they could move through Congress individually. Both are expected to have President Barack Obama's backing.

Whitney Stanco, an analyst at Concept Capital's Washington Research Group, predicted the full Senate would make some significant changes to the liability bill.

"We continue to believe the language will likely be moderated on the Senate floor to allow for some risk-adjusted liability limits for shallow-water facilities," Stanco said.

BP has agreed to establish a $20 billion compensation fund to pay claims from its spill in April, which continues to devastate communities and the environment along the Gulf coast. But total liabilities could eclipse that sum.

Kenneth Feinberg, the official overseeing the fund, said he expects to complete the first phase of work in setting up the claims facility within the next 30 days.

REPUBLICANS CALL IT COSTLY

Republicans said lifting the liability cap would prevent smaller companies from offshore drilling projects in the Gulf of Mexico, which holds the most promising untapped crude oil reserves in the United States. It could open the door to more foreign operators, such as Chinese firms, they said.

"Drilling will be so costly that only a few will be able to afford it," said Senator James Inhofe, the senior Republican on the committee. "Who are those? Big Oil," he said.

Instead, he offered an alternative, which was blocked by Democrats, that would have given the president the discretion in setting liability limits, tied to the type of offshore projects.

Deepwater drilling in the Gulf of Mexico has been the biggest hope for growth in U.S. domestic oil production over the last decade. A string of major discoveries over the past decade by companies including BP have rejuvenated investment in deeper and more difficult waters.

(Editing by Lisa Shumaker and Cynthia Osterman)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (10)
jgb38 wrote:
What liabilities do Government inspectors have for allowing these conditions to exist? Shouldn’t they at the very least be fired?

Jun 30, 2010 3:03pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Billcarson wrote:
WHY NOT MAKE THE PAYMENTS INCLUDE THE 2003 BOUCHARD B 120 OIL SPILL IN 2003 ?

President Barack Obama and the Democrats have said, “BP is responsible for this leak. BP will be paying the bill and if they don’t he’ll kick their butts,.”The question is which bill is the president talking about? Is it all the bills to the federal government and the residential home owners property damage bills?

We have got to ask how the response to the Gulf of Mexico spill compares to the 2003 Bouchard B 120 oil spill in Buzzards Bay,Massaacusetts? Do the residents of Massachusetts have to wait in line ? We’ve been waiting eight years !

Two things come to mind. First the U.S.Court of appeals never allowed the state of Massachusetts to enforce the Massachusetts Oil Spill Prevention Act of 2004. The Coast Guard appealed the rules because of an intercoastal turf war leaving the state with no new laws to protect the bay. Second the residential property claims of thousands of residents have been tied up in the Massachusetts court system for the past eight years. How will residential property owners around the gulf have to wait?

On April 27, 2003, eight years ago the Bouchard Barge B-120 hit an obstacle in Buzzards Bay, Massachusetts creating a 12-foot rupture in its hull and discharging an estimated 100,000 gallons of No. 6 oil.

Jun 30, 2010 3:24pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Philabias wrote:
obama should jail the officals how overseen this tragity

Jun 30, 2010 3:34pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.