U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

Study finds prostate screening cuts cancer deaths

Related Topics

LONDON | Wed Jun 30, 2010 9:57pm EDT

LONDON (Reuters) - An extensive study into the merits of screening men between the ages of 50 and 65 for prostate cancer has found it can cut death rates from the disease by as much as half, Swedish scientists said Thursday.

But the findings don't necessarily mean nationwide prostate screening programs should introduced, experts said, since they run the risk of significant overdiagnosis of tumors in men who would not have suffered any harm from their cancer.

Researchers from the University of Gothenburg conducted a trial involving 20,000 men who were divided equally into a group that was offered prostate screening and a group that was not.

The screening method used was so-called prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, which is widely used in the United States and other developed countries to detect early signs of tumors.

Over 14 years of follow-up, prostate cancer death rates were cut almost by half in the screening group compared with the non-screening group, as men were diagnosed and treated in time to stop the cancer from killing them.

Jonas Hugosson, who led the study, said the results showed that PSA screening of all men this age group "can result in a relevant reduction in cancer mortality."

Screening for cancer -- or for clues such as pre-cancerous cells -- is strongly encouraged in wealthy nations as a way of improving public health. But there are growing doubts about whether the screening's benefits always outweigh the negatives, with the main concerns centering on the risk of overdiagnosis.

A large U.S. study published last year found that routine prostate screening has resulted in more than 1 million American men being diagnosed with tumors who might otherwise have suffered no ill effects from them. In that study, researchers said that around 20 men had to be diagnosed and treated for every one who benefited.

In the Swedish study, which was published in The Lancet medical journal Thursday, the researchers said the risk of overdiagnosis was less, but still 12 men needed to be diagnosed to save one life.

Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men after lung cancer, killing around 254,000 men a year around the world. U.S. doctors have routinely recommended PSA screening in men over 50 based on the assumption that early diagnosis and treatment is better than standing by and doing nothing.

But fears about overdiagnosis, which can lead to treatments such as surgery, radiation or hormone therapy that can cause serious side-effects such as impotence and incontinence, have so far dissuaded many European countries from nationwide screening.

A similar debate over breast cancer screening is also raging among doctors in Europe and United States, with critics of national mammography screening programs saying they needlessly harm thousands of women's lives by picking up tumors that would otherwise not have caused a problem.

In a commentary on the Swedish study, David Neal from Britain's Cambridge University, said it showed that "in certain circumstances, PSA testing and early diagnosis reduces death from prostate cancer."

But he added: "It does not imply that PSA screening programs should now be introduced internationally."

(Editing by Noah Barkin)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
VitaminD3Man wrote:
Research workers additionally estimated that 1,500 adult men might have to end up being tested and near to 50 adult men whose cancers had been discovered by way of screening might have to possibly be treated in order to avoid a single cancer fatality.

1500 tested to save one fatality?

The real issue is overtreatement, especially regarding invasive “procedures”, which routinely ruined the sex lives and psyches of literally hundreds of men per fatality avoided.

When will the class action lawsuits commence?

You know, for the hundreds of thousands of men who were steered by their physicians to have “procedures” they did not need?

Jul 01, 2010 8:53am EDT  --  Report as abuse
I_N_T_P wrote:
I disagree with the term “overdiagnose”. To me, overdiagnose means a person was told that there was cancer when there was no cancer. That is not the issue here. The issue is partly that after treatment, some are unhappy with the side effects and wish they had not had treatment. Another aspect of the issue is sometimes men survive for years with this type of cancer and die from something unrelated.
Since doctors don’t know who is going to be unhappy with the treatment and who will live for a long time without treatment, some doctors want to treat only cases of prostate cancer where the nature/extent of the disease has limited the viable options. If prostate cancer screening is limited, there will be angry cries from those who screening would have saved. Prostate cancer is a very painful way to die. 1500 tested to save one fatality is worth it to the one and his family.

Jul 01, 2010 11:55am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Fishrl wrote:
You don’t cut into a man because of high PSA. You get the test results, then you feel for lumps, do an ultrasound, do a biopsy, and you cut when you find it. PSA is just the smoke, and sometimes there’s no fire. A good doctor knows when there’s a fire.

Every man should get this. Every man. There’s no excuse for denying it.

Jul 01, 2010 12:11pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.