China convicts U.S. geologist of stealing state secrets

BEIJING Mon Jul 5, 2010 10:35am EDT

BEIJING (Reuters) - A geologist accused of stealing state secrets after he brokered the sale of an oil database has been sentenced to eight years in jail, the U.S. embassy said on Monday, over two-and-one-half years after he was detained.

Geologist Xue Feng, a 44-year-old U.S. citizen born in China, was detained late in 2007 after negotiating the sale of an oil industry database to his employer at the time, Colorado-based consultancy IHS Energy, now known as IHS Inc.

Xue was convicted of attempting to obtain and traffic in state secrets, a year after his trial ended, said the Duihua Foundation, which advocates for prisoners' rights in China and the United States. The database was classified as a state secret only after it was sold, it added.

"We are dismayed by Dr. Xue's eight-year sentence and 200,000 yuan ($29,540) fine. We remain concerned about his rights to due process under Chinese law," U.S. embassy spokesman Richard Buangan said in an email. China's notoriously vague state secrets laws received international attention last year, when Australian citizen Stern Hu and three colleagues working for mining giant Rio Tinto were detained for stealing state secrets during the course of tense iron ore negotiations.

The four were later convicted of the lesser charges of receiving kickbacks and stealing commercial secrets. The verdict of at least two senior Chinese steel officials accused of leaking the secrets has never been revealed, more than three months after they were convicted in a closed trial by a Shanghai court.

Xue's case only became public two years after he was detained. He was burned with cigarettes while in detention, Jerome Cohen, a legal expert advising Xue's family, has said.

"Obviously the sentence seems very harsh, especially when the evidence was so weak that the prosecutor had to return the case to the police twice and the court had to return the case to the prosecutor twice and then take almost a year after the trial to render its decision," Cohen, a professor at New York University School of Law, wrote in an email.

Xue's sentence was not listed among the public rulings of the Beijing No. 1 Intermediate Court. Phone calls to the court were not immediately answered at midday on Monday.

"I have visited Xue Feng several times during the past half year. He has stayed strong during this difficult time. My thoughts are with him and his family, with whom I hope he will be reunited soon," U.S. Ambassador Jon Huntsman, who attended Monday's sentencing, said in a statement.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (6)
So, China makes the database a “state secret” AFTER the negotiations are completed?!?!?!?!?! So, basically, at the time he was doing nothing wrong…….only later when China decided they needed to find an excuse to throw him in jail did they change the database into a “state secret.” Then the chinese hold him in jail for almost 3 years before they even charge him with a crime!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

What the h— is wrong with China?!?!

Jul 05, 2010 11:18am EDT  --  Report as abuse
AlexZ83 wrote:
It’s a communist country! That’s what’s wrong with it! Why are you so surprised?

Jul 05, 2010 11:41am EDT  --  Report as abuse
alreaud wrote:
But when Chinese businessmen come to the US, we give them the country, lock, stock, and barrel. We sell them the businesses even, and all acompanying technology. And when they knock down our planes (the P3 over the S. China sea), we just let them basically strip the airplane, kiss their arse and make it a one-way technology transfer, LOL!

Almost like the US is actually SCARED to fight a superpower but is more than willing to bully a wimp country for oil or resources to the detriment of the US taxpayer.

So this is a pig ruling by a pig court, on a legal surface that appears to be quantum foam. The better question is why we even do business with them. But I’m $ure everybody know$ the an$wer…

Jul 05, 2010 12:52pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.