Reuters Photojournalism
Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography. See more | Photo caption
Sponsored Links
Senior Palestinian calls Jerusalem a "time bomb"
JERUSALEM |
JERUSALEM (Reuters) - A senior Palestinian figure said on Sunday that rising tension with Israel over settlement building in the Jerusalem area was a "time bomb" that was eroding trust between the two sides.
Ahmed Qurei, a former prime minister and negotiator, joined Tsipi Livni, a former Israeli foreign minister and now opposition leader in parliament, in calling on both sides to work harder to achieve a two-state solution.
"The Jerusalem situation, I think, is a time bomb if it continues in this way," Qurei told a forum of mostly Israeli academics in Jerusalem, referring to the expansion of Jewish settlements in East Jerusalem and plans to demolish Palestinian homes to make way for more construction.
"It has an impact on the Palestinian people ... and on trust on both sides," Qurei added.
Jerusalem is a core issue in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Israel has annexed East Jerusalem as part of its capital in a move not recognized internationally, and Palestinians want the area as capital of a future state in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.
The conflict has erupted lately into weekly protests by Israelis and Palestinians, mostly in the predominantly Palestinian areas of Silwan and Sheikh Jarrah, where Jewish settlers have been moving in.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, back from talks in Washington with President Barack Obama, said he might discuss Jerusalem but did not hint at any concessions.
"We have differences of views with the Palestinians. We want a united city. They have their own views. We can -- this is one of the issues that will have to be negotiated," Netanyahu said on Fox News Sunday.
Though Netanyahu supports a two-state solution, and wants direct talks with Western-backed Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, pro-settler parties in his government have made it hard for him to yield enough ground on core issues.
Abbas, for his part, insists on making more progress before indirect talks launched in May are upgraded.
Qurei, an ally of Abbas's Fatah movement and an architect of a 1993 interim deal with Israel negotiated in the Norwegian capital, was bitter at the slow pace of diplomacy since then.
"It is 19 years since Oslo, and things remain as is," he said.
Livni, head of Israel's centrist Kadima party that lost an election last year to Netanyahu's right-wing Likud, called the current period "a crucial point in time."
Iranian-backed Islamist groups that reject Israel's existence are gaining ground, and Israel should seize the chance to make peace with Palestinian moderates, Livni said.
Agreeing to Palestinian statehood in the West Bank, which Israel captured in the 1967 Middle East war, "is in Israel's interest, and not a gift to the president of the United States," she added. "The status quo is not possible."
(Editing by Tim Pearce)
- Tweet this
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Reprints
So really all he can speak for is the West Bank!
He wants East Jerusalem? After several wars by the Arab countries to destroy her, they can’t give Jerusalem back.
It would probably mean NO JEWS ALLOWED in the area taken over. Just like when Jordan ran Jerusalem.
Many have considered Jerusalem a timed bomb for centuries simply because multiple religions ethnic races all claim it to be there exclusive own.
In my books, America should not support ANY government, Israeli or Palestinian or ANY other making historical, religious or other claims to sole control UNLESS
they have a CONCRETE plan to run a government with representative of all racial and ethnic groups in their controlling legislative, executive and judicial ultimate authorities.
NEITHER the Israeli NOR the Palestinian so-called leaders meet this standard.
BB’s rhetoric of historical bond contradicts American democratic and equality principles, and is laughable because he, a “constitutional professor” turned politician, has abandoned constitutional principles in being evasive about the unconsitutional siding with Israel, and with selective allowance of Israel to violate International Nuclear Control Rules.
It’s just a matter of time that somebody will call upon the unconstitutional nature of this insane support of any side based on race, religion or ethnic origin.
As eloquent as BB is on constitional law, it is going to be his archilles heel because he cannot feign ignorance like G.W.Bush did.
Hamas threatens Israel with extinction:
What does that mean?
It means nothing more than that Israel becomes a state for Israelis, not a state just for Jews!
Zionists call this “extinction”, “annihilation”, “wiping off the face of the
map” in their vain attempts to obscure the issue which is their Messianic
desire to take over Palestinian land. But really, all that is needed is that Israel become an ordinary country where every citizen has equal rights!
One difficulty: Zionism is a racist ideology. We know it excludes people who
are not members of the Jewish “race” in Israel. Zionism is largely imported
from Russia and its ex-satellites with distinctly Russian racist overtones.
See wikipedia: “Racism in Russia”, mostly racism against darker “southern” people.
Arab Muslims have a long history of getting along with Jews. Now that
European/Russian Jews are a little bit on top in Israel, the world is having
big problems, largely coming from Russian-block-related Jews in Israel and
America. Although Jews were discriminated against in Russia, it appears they
have brought with them the much worse Russian discrimination against
“black” people.
It will be a long hard battle against this racism, perhaps only won after
the European/Russian immigrants have passed into history.





Follow Reuters