Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Rage in Brazil

Mass protests erupt in the biggest cities of Brazil.  Slideshow 

Photo

The Afghan Army

The many faces of the Afghan National Army, which has taken over security of the country from NATO.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Consumer Reports will not recommend Apple iPhone 4

A customer looks at an iPhone 4 at the Apple Store 5th Avenue in New York, in this June 24, 2010 file photo. REUTERS/Eric Thayer/Files

A customer looks at an iPhone 4 at the Apple Store 5th Avenue in New York, in this June 24, 2010 file photo.

Credit: Reuters/Eric Thayer/Files

SAN FRANCISCO | Mon Jul 12, 2010 4:01pm EDT

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Consumer Reports said it cannot recommend Apple's iPhone 4 to buyers after tests confirmed the device's well-publicized reception glitches.

It added that that AT&T Inc, the exclusive mobile phone carrier for the iPhone 4, was not necessarily the main culprit.

The influential nonprofit organization, which publishes guides on everything from cars to TVs, said in a report released on Monday that it also tested other phones -- including the iPhone 3GS and Palm Pre -- and found none had the signal-loss problems of Apple's latest iPhone.

The report was the latest blow to the iPhone 4, which sold 1.7 million units in its first three days on the market but has been plagued by complaints of poor reception. Many of the complaints involve a wraparound antenna whose signal strength is said to be affected if touched in a certain way.

Kaufman Bros analyst Shaw Wu said he was surprised by the stance that Consumer Reports took on the new iPhone. Wu noted that the group's recommendations are used as a guide by many consumers.

"Consumer reports is a respected publication. This could have an impact on iPhone sales," Wu said.

Apple shares were down 1 percent at $257.06 on Monday afternoon on the Nasdaq.

The company has been sued by iPhone customers in at least three complaints related to antenna problems.

"When your finger or hand touches a spot on the phone's lower left side -- an easy thing, especially for lefties -- the signal can significantly degrade enough to cause you to lose your connection altogether if you're in an area with a weak signal," contributor Mike Gikas said in a report on the Consumer Reports website.

"Our findings call into question the recent claim by Apple that the iPhone 4's signal-strength issues were largely an optical illusion caused by faulty software that 'mistakenly displays 2 more bars than it should for a given signal strength,'" Gikas said.

Apple did not respond to a request for comment.

Gikas recommended covering the gap in the wraparound antenna with duct tape or some other non-conductive material.

Apple has said almost any cellphone will suffer a loss of signal if held in certain ways. It said later it had discovered a software glitch that overstates signal strength, though it did not directly address concerns about the antenna with that admission.

On the flip side, Consumer Reports said the iPhone scored high on other testing grounds such as battery life, sharp display and high-quality video camera.

However, Gikas said the signal problem was the reason the iPhone 4 would not be classified as a "recommended" device in its smartphone ratings.

"Apple needs to come out with a permanent -- and free -- fix to the antenna problem before we can recommend the iPhone4," said Gikas in his blog post on ConsumerReports.org.

(Reporting by Carolina Madrid and Gabriel Madway; Editing by Edwin Chan, Matthew Lewis and Steve Orlofsky)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (15)
marshallg wrote:
I think that Judge Ware is making a very poor decision for a variety of reasons. Most important of all is that the consumer’s most significant concern is the security of his or her mobile device and the software which runs upon it. These devices are used for secure e-mail, banking, commerce and similar applications in which security should be of utmost importance to the consumer. With Apple’s centralized control and distribution of software, this security can be maintained and violating software can be quickly removed from circulation. This need alone out-rules a perceived “right” of a software publisher to write and distribute any software he wishes to any person he wishes.

As a consumer and a parent, I highly value Apple’s Store and the security and confidence which it provides, and it would be a disservice to millions of consumers like me if this benefit is taken away from us.

Jul 12, 2010 2:53pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
HBC wrote:
So… AT&T’s “not the main culprit”? What does that make AT&T, and how would anyone at Consumer Reports know? They don’t have any other functional network to test it against.

Don’t get me wrong, not everything Apple does is golden, but their biggest and most diabolical mistake ever as far as I’m concerned was stifling phone users with the worst network provider in the world, and still having no alternative carrier to which the iPhone could be calibrated. It’s too early and frankly naive to exonerate AT&T in any way.

Jul 12, 2010 3:14pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Kittysafe wrote:
Charging $29 for a bumper is criminal and insulting.

I hope the consumer protection agency gets involved.

Jul 12, 2010 3:28pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.