Pakistan ISI behind Mumbai attacks: India official

NEW DELHI Wed Jul 14, 2010 7:43am EDT

Photographers run past burning Taj Mahal Hotel during a gun battle in Mumbai in this November 29, 2008 file photo. REUTERS/Arko Datta

Photographers run past burning Taj Mahal Hotel during a gun battle in Mumbai in this November 29, 2008 file photo.

Credit: Reuters/Arko Datta

Related Topics

NEW DELHI (Reuters) - Pakistan's intelligence agency controlled and coordinated the 2008 Mumbai attacks, a top Indian security official said, in what is the most direct accusation yet of Pakistan by India in the strikes that killed 166 people.

Home Secretary G.K. Pillai's comments to an Indian newspaper published on Wednesday come a day before the foreign ministers of the nuclear-armed rivals meet in Islamabad to repair relations worsened by the attacks.

The two sides are trying to revive a peace dialogue crucial not only for improving their ties but also the security outlook in Afghanistan where the two countries vie for influence.

India last year linked Pakistan's Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) with the attacks, saying the perpetrators were "clients and creations" of the agency.

But Pillai's remarks are more direct and could find resonance in the foreign ministers' meeting.

"It was not just a peripheral role," the Indian Express newspaper quoted Pillai as saying. "They (ISI) were literally controlling and coordinating it from the beginning till the end."

Pillai was not immediately available for comment.

India has blamed Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) militants for the Mumbai attacks. It broke off a 4-year-old peace process with Pakistan, saying reviving the dialogue would depend on action against LeT and its chief Hafiz Muhammad Saeed.

Pillai said the evidence against the ISI emerged from the interrogation by Indian officials of a Chicago man, David Headley, who pleaded guilty to working with LeT to plan the attacks.

"The sense that has come out from Headley's interrogation is that the ISI has had a much more significant role to play (in the attacks)," said Pillai, the top-ranking official in charge of domestic security.

"The same goes for Hafiz Saeed. He was not a peripheral player. He knew everything."

India has handed over to Pakistan several dossiers of evidence, including against Saeed, but Islamabad says there are no grounds to try the LeT chief.

Pillai said he was hopeful that Pakistan would share information on steps it has taken against the Mumbai planners.

"We have given them a whole series of data and information that we have. We have given them the names, we have given them the descriptions, we have given them what their height is or their complexion is," he said.

"Now it is up to them."

(Writing by Krittivas Mukherjee, editing by Andrew Marshall)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
finneganG wrote:
This is no surprise. The ISI has in bed with the Taliban and al Qaeda. Until Pakistan cleans house, the ISI will be the destruction of their country with muslim fanatics taking over.

Pakistan is a country ready to tip over the edge.

In some locations, it is a good idea to have a military dictatorship.

Jul 14, 2010 9:31am EDT  --  Report as abuse
my_opinion wrote:
Democracy is a process that should be started and nurtured at the lowest levels of the society, like a seed that eventually defies the pressure of the soil and heads out. Such can not be forced into a nation top-down.

Such nations take comfort in dictatorships, grass route education will create the jobless crowd that will change it. It just takes time. Look who is in charge of education.

Jul 14, 2010 11:22am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.