Factbox: Developments in the Gulf of Mexico oil spill

Wed Jul 14, 2010 10:32pm EDT

(Reuters) - Here are some developments in BP Plc's Gulf of Mexico oil spill, the largest in U.S. history.

TOP DEVELOPMENTS

* BP starts a crucial test on its ruptured oil well in the Gulf of Mexico that it hopes will lead to halting the flow of crude that has polluted the sea and shoreline since April.

* A BP executive says undersea robots working a mile below the ocean surface have started shutting a sequence of three valves in a capping device installed on Monday.

POLITICS/POLICY

* BP's safety record would bar the company from getting new U.S. offshore oil and gas exploration leases for up to seven years under a bill passed by a U.S. House committee.

* The EU's executive plans to toughen rules covering accident prevention and liability for offshore oil drilling in response to BP's spill, Europe's environment chief says.

* U.S. financial regulators urge banks to work with businesses in states that have been hit by the spill by temporarily waiving late fees and other charges.

* The chairman of Diamond Offshore Drilling Inc says the U.S. moratorium on deepwater oil drilling was not needed and that the industry had become far more vigilant since the April BP oil well blowout.

* Italy is considering new rules to tighten permits for offshore oil and gas exploration and production after BP's spill in the Gulf of Mexico, the Industry Ministry Undersecretary says.

MARKET IMPACT/COMPANIES

* BP shares closed down 2.28 percent in London and closed down 1.9 percent in New York on Wednesday.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT

* While BP's new containment cap may offer a chance to stanch the flow of oil gushing into the Gulf of Mexico, those who live on the Louisiana coast say it is already too late.

(Compiled by Alyson Zepeda in Houston; editing by Todd Eastham)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
HemiHead66 wrote:
Why don’t you oil cronies get your wiz-kids to incorporate something into you wells that’ll make it 100% possible to contain a blow-out. Then you’ll be able to drill. I mean, you’d have to be crazy to think we’re going to rely on some garbage blow-out preventer that works only 50% of the time. If you people put as much effort into safety as you do lying, you wouldn’t be in this situation.

Jul 15, 2010 5:42am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Mlynch001 wrote:
Why don’t we drill for oil where the water is not 5000 feet deep? There is NO such thing as a 100% fail proof device or in the case of an oil drilling operation a whole SYSTEM of devices. Probability teaches us that there is NO 100% safe mechanical device or system! What has made this so difficult to control , is the fact that everything has to be done by robots and remote control 5000 feet under the ocean! If our ENTIRE GOVERNMENT (not just the President) put half as much real WORK into enforcing EXISTING safety regulations instead of taking bribes, watching porn, spinning news for personal or party gain and just doing their jobs we would not be in this situation! The GOVERNMENT is the institution that is supposed to be ENFORCING drilling regulations, just as they are SUPPOSED to be enforcing immigration and border control. This is not a private industry problem, this is a government caused problem due to LACK of Enforcement and effective oversight!

Jul 15, 2010 7:37am EDT  --  Report as abuse
“This is not a private industry problem, this is a government caused problem due to LACK of Enforcement and effective oversight!”

Puuleeze. So which is it? Private Industry can’t function with government regulatory intervention, or Private Industry can’t function without government regulatory intervention? ‘Stop Me Before I Pollute Again!’ ‘What is the moral high ground? My business-sense can’t make heads or tails of the proper action! The Big, Bad, Guvmint Must Provide Oversight!’

Katrina was an act of nature; Deepwater is an act of corporate greed, malfeasance, ineptitude–coupled with the reckless pursuit of profits, while gambling on the lives of their own workers and the livelihoods of other Industries. It’s a sorry indictment of the entire petroleum corporate mentality if they must rely on government safety regulations to tell them how to do the right thing.

Jul 15, 2010 8:16am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.