Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Devastated by Tornado

A huge tornado tears through an Oklahoma City suburb.  Slideshow 

Photo

Message of humility

A religious fraternity in Rio considers the election of Pope Francis, a confirmation of their beliefs in poverty and simplicity.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

School funds fight ramps up, Obama threatens veto

Related Topics

Related Video

President Obama greets third and fourth grade students at Viers Mill Elementary School in Silver Spring, Maryland, October 19, 2009. REUTERS/Jason Reed

President Obama greets third and fourth grade students at Viers Mill Elementary School in Silver Spring, Maryland, October 19, 2009.

Credit: Reuters/Jason Reed

WASHINGTON | Thu Jul 15, 2010 3:07pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The fight to win extra federal funding for states for education jobs is growing fiercer in the U.S. Congress, just as President Barack Obama threatens to veto a $10 billion schools measure if the money is taken from a stimulus education program.

In early July, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a defense spending bill that included $10 billion for school jobs. Some funding would come out of the Race to the Top program created in the stimulus plan that Obama has touted as an important step toward reforming education.

"The President supports teacher jobs but we will recommend a veto if the final bill includes cuts to reform programs," said White House Director of the Domestic Policy Melody Barnes in a conference call with reporters on Thursday. "It doesn't have to come to that."

Secretary of Education Arne Duncan said Congress would likely take $500 million away from the Race program under the proposed legislation.

Because the House added billions of dollars in non-military spending before passing the war funds, the measure must return to the Senate, which already passed its own bill for supporting troops in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Barnes said Congress could fund the boost in other ways, and Obama is working with the Senate to find sources.

Fiscal conservatives are worried that efforts to assist U.S. states, which are still in an economic quagmire from the recession that began in 2007, will add to the country's ballooning debt and deficit.

Democrats say state economies risk collapse, which could derail the nation's wobbly economic recovery.

"We have been told by economists that if these state economies go down, we could go into a recession that will be very hard to dig out of," Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi told reporters on Thursday.

"It is not in anybody's interest, for deficit reduction or job creation, for us to have stability of the state economies be jeopardized," she added.

As well as sending $10 billion to states for education jobs, the administration would like to give states additional funds for Medicaid, the healthcare program for the poor that typically accounts for a third of state budgets.

A measure for those funds stalled in Congress after being attached to spending bills conservatives said were not covered by revenue.

When it comes to education, withholding the $10 billion will cost the economy 100,000 to 300,000 jobs, White House Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers Christina Romer said on the conference call. Keeping teachers employed will save money because they will not have to file for unemployment insurance and will continue to pay taxes at their current rate, she said.

The National Education Association has said the additional funds will save approximately 138,000 education jobs.

The $862 billion stimulus plan passed last year included a transfer of $135 billion to states, with much of the money going toward education. States have already used most of the money.

The plan included $4 billion of Race to the Top grants to spur academic innovation and boost support for semi-autonomous public charter schools. Since the plan was passed in February 2009, only two states have received the grants, with Delaware winning about $100 million and Tennessee about $500 million.

(Reporting by Lisa Lambert and Donna Smith; Editing by Dan Grebler)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
FredIsDead wrote:
Here’s a thought…maybe the federal government should get out of the business of extortion. They take money from the people of every state, then won’t give it back unless they follow federal rules. Why?? Because the federal government cannot force education requirements upon states without extortion. THERE IS NO CONSTITUTIONAL PERMISSION FOR THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO RUN EDUCATION. OR HEALTH CARE FOR THAT MATTER. So they become an organized crime unit, forcing protection money from us via taxes and then not giving it back unless we do what we are told.

Jul 15, 2010 6:21pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Alpha_Blogger wrote:
The Democrats are out of control. November cannot arrive soon enough.

Jul 15, 2010 6:52pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Ree wrote:
I do not believe education is defined by party alone. A majority of decisions take place behind closed doors that the public is not made privy to. I support our state educational unions to lobby for federal funding. Preparation of the application for the Race to the Top funding is taking valuable time and monies away from current state educational resources when in fact only ~8 states will eventually qualify for this opportunity. All this achieves at the state level is the creation of empty legislative promises that will become unfunded mandates when their state does not qualify for the funding.

Educational reform is not a federal issue…NCLB is a great concept, but should serve as a guideline, not as a one-size-fits-all model that all states have to comply with (funding or not).

Federal intervention will not ’save’ our schools or our children. Highly qualified teachers supported by effective parenting will. If this administration believes that should remain competitive, I strongly disagree with their thinking.

Jul 16, 2010 11:17am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.