U.S. to send stern message to North Korea

North Korean leader Kim Jong-il (2nd L) visits the newly-built Taekyedo tideland at an undisclosed location in North Korea, in this undated picture released by North Korea's official news agency KCNA July 17, 2010. REUTERS/KCNA

North Korean leader Kim Jong-il (2nd L) visits the newly-built Taekyedo tideland at an undisclosed location in North Korea, in this undated picture released by North Korea's official news agency KCNA July 17, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/KCNA

WASHINGTON | Sun Jul 18, 2010 1:02am EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama's top diplomat and defense chief head to Seoul this week to discuss ways to respond to North Korea and deter it from any future attack after the sinking of a South Korean warship.

But the high-profile visit by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Defense Secretary Robert Gates risks angering China in the process, with an expected announcement of U.S.-South Korean military exercises that have set off alarms in Beijing.

Tension between North and South Korea remain high following the March sinking of the warship, Cheonan, killing 46 South Korean sailors. Pyongyang has denied responsibility and escaped censure this month from the United Nations, which condemned the attack but, in deference to China, did not blame North Korea.

Assistant Secretary of State Kurt Campbell said the talks in Seoul were aimed at assessing the next steps with North Korea, including whether and how to resume stalled talks about Pyongyang's nuclear program. Pyongyang said this month it was willing to return to disarmament talks, in limbo since 2007.

"The United States is considering a variety of options associated with North Korea and we will be in deep consultations," Campbell said.

But he stressed that an essential precondition for any new talks would be that Pyongyang cease its "provocative ways" and commit to denuclearization of the Korean peninsula.

Victor Cha, a former director of Asian Affairs at the White House National Security Council under the Bush administration, said he expected that re-engagement will take a back seat to the main message of deterrence during the visit to Seoul.

"Right now on this trip the focus is going to be on the deterrence part, that will be the big public message ... But privately, the conversations will also deal with getting these talks back on track," said Cha, who works for the Center for Strategic and International Studies think tank in Washington.

The visit has symbolic overtones, a show of U.S.-South Korean unity 60 years after the outbreak of the 1950-1953 Korean War. Gates will meet some of the 28,000 U.S. troops stationed in South Korea on Tuesday.

The trip will culminate Wednesday in the first talks between the U.S. and South Korean secretaries of defense and state. U.S. officials say the top-level event, reserved for only the closest U.S. allies, shows how important Obama views relations with South Korea, Asia's fourth-largest economy.

Clinton also plans discuss the U.S.-South Korea economic relationship, where President Barack Obama has vowed to push through a long-stalled free trade agreement, as well as South Korea's preparations to hold the a G20 summit this year.

WAR GAMES

U.S. officials say the talks are likely to yield at least one concrete result: the announcement in Seoul of a series of joint U.S.-South Korean military drills over a period of months in both the Yellow Sea and the Sea of Japan.

"These are exercises that enhance our anti-submarine warfare capabilities. They will also, by extension, be a show of force to the North Koreans, and send a message -- what we hope to be a very strong message -- of deterrence," said Pentagon Press Secretary Geoff Morrell.

China, North Korea's sole ally, has voiced deep concerns about any U.S.-South Korean drills in the Yellow Sea, which separates China and the Korean peninsula, and urged regional powers to put the Cheonan incident behind them.

U.S. officials, briefing reporters ahead of the trip, dismissed those concerns, saying drills in international waters in the Yellow Sea or elsewhere were "routine."

"This is about sending a message to (North Korea). It's not about sending a message to the Chinese. And it should not be interpreted as such," Morrell said.

John Park, a researcher at the United States Institute of Peace who studies Chinese-North Korean relations, said drills risked aggravating ties between the United States and China.

"As much as the (U.S.-South Korean) announcement will be focused on a sending a message to North Korea, the unintended consequence is that messages are also being sent to China," Park said.

Beijing broke off military-to-military contacts with the United States this year after the Obama administration notified Congress of a plan to sell Taiwan up to $6.4 billion worth of arms. Underscoring its displeasure, Beijing turned down a proposed fence-mending visit by Gates to China in June.

Park said that inside China, some believe the United States and South Korea are using the Cheonan "as its own pretext to enlarge the scope of the U.S.-South Korean alliance" west toward Chinese coastal waters.

"Their question is: Will the anti-submarine warfare exercises signal an expansion of the coverage area of the U.S.-(South Korea) alliance?"

(Additional reporting by Andrew Quinn; Editing by Stacey Joyce)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (13)
biztru wrote:
US will have a hard time mending fences with China after this.

Japan and South Korea according to Global Firepower Index is ranked 9th and 12th respectively. Probably Japan’s ranking, a very intelligent and harworking nation with very strong national pride that is probably not matched by many other than Germany is an understatement. Will Japan be laxed with her military capabilities? This means North Korea knows she will endanger herself messing with Japan. China has no incentive to side NK over Japan and will most likely remain neutral, its hallmark these days. How will the rest of the world i.e. the Europeans, Russians, Asians, Arabs, Africans and A-Latins view the US? Probably as delivering a slap on someone’s face without a good reason – so much for the American charm and soft power.

Jul 18, 2010 3:20am EDT  --  Report as abuse
biztru wrote:
Just to add…

China’s relation with Japan could be much closer than that of China with North Korea. China has already accepted substantial investments from Japan. If relationship was secondary to that with North Korea, those investments wouldn’t have made their way into China and stayed there until today. It is maybe flawed to perceive that China favours NK over Japan or for the matter South Korea. Can the world be fooled into believing that China is so adamant to want North Korea as her only friend but not the rest of the world or that China just wished to control, control and control instead of being equal friends with everyone – not likely…

Jul 18, 2010 3:30am EDT  --  Report as abuse
bck555 wrote:
Do you remember when you were a kid and there was a really bad spoiled rotten kid on the block? There mother had also been a really bad spoiled rotten kid when she was young and still intimidated the rest of the mothers on the block. Consequently, her really bad spoiled rotten kid was able to continue, while she protected him, intimidated the rest of the neighbors and allowed his behavior to deteroiate. In my case, this continued until her kid killed another. Of course, she just hired a good lawyer and got him out of the charge.

Murder and murderous people must be contained and dealt with appropriately. What in the world is with all of this finger wagging? Do we really think we can shame these people into behaving like citizens of this world?

Jul 18, 2010 3:41am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.