Read
- Special Report: Syria's Islamists seize control as moderates dither
- Angelina Jolie stunt double sues News Corp over hacking
- Global shares firm, dollar steady before Fed decision
- Kanye West wins over critics with 'daring' new album 'Yeezus'
- Journalist who brought down U.S. general is killed in Los Angeles car crash
Reuters Photojournalism
Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography. See more | Photo caption
The Afghan Army
The many faces of the Afghan National Army, which has taken over security of the country from NATO. Slideshow
Sponsored Links
Obama and Cameron tread cautiously on BP
1 of 14. President Barack Obama smiles as British Prime Minister David Cameron speaks to reporters in the East Room at the White House in Washington July 20, 2010.
Credit: Reuters/Kevin Lamarque
WASHINGTON |
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - British Prime Minister David Cameron on Tuesday rejected calls for an inquiry into whether BP Plc influenced the release of the Lockerbie bomber, even as he sought to ease transatlantic tensions in talks with U.S. President Barack Obama.
Determined not to let the Lockerbie controversy and BP's role in the Gulf of Mexico oil spill overshadow their White House meeting, the two leaders reaffirmed the much-vaunted "special relationship" between their countries.
Cameron said he understood U.S. anger over BP's role in the spill and tried to defuse U.S. lawmakers' concerns that the company may have had a hand in Scottish authorities' release last year of a Libyan convicted in the 1988 bombing of Pan Am flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland.
But Cameron, under pressure at home to stand up for the British energy giant against the bashing it has faced in Washington, also insisted it was in U.S. and British interests for the company to remain strong and viable.
Obama, whose approval ratings have been undercut by public outrage over the spill, avoided the tough language he has often used against BP over its handling of Gulf disaster and also played down the simmering controversy over the Lockerbie case.
"I completely understand the anger that exists right across America. The oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico is a catastrophe," Cameron told reporters as he stood side-by-side with Obama in his first U.S. visit since taking power in May.
"It is BP's role to cap the leak, clean up the mess and pay appropriate compensation," Cameron said.
But he also cautioned, "Let us not confuse the oil spill with the Libyan bomber."
Cameron insisted BP had no role in the release of Abdel Basset al-Megrahi, which he opposed at the time, and pledged his government's aid in any U.S. Senate probe into the matter.
Steering clear of any public disagreement, Obama said he was confident the British government would cooperate to make sure all the facts are known.
In an apparent bid to assuage U.S. concerns, Cameron ordered his cabinet secretary to review documents in the case and agreed to meet U.S. lawmakers on the issue on Tuesday.
But he rejected in advance their demands for a full British investigation. "I don't need an inquiry to tell me what was a bad decision," Cameron said.
FIRST-NAME BASIS
Though problems swirling around BP have threatened to complicate U.S.-British ties, Obama joined Cameron in lauding the historic alliance between their countries as alive and well. Some critics see the concept as outdated in the 21st century.
The two leaders, calling each other by their first names, presented a united front on the war in Afghanistan, sanctions against Iran and efforts toward Middle East peace.
But they papered over differences on their governments' strategies toward renewing economic growth.
Cameron has led European attempts to cut budget deficits that have ballooned following the global financial crisis, while the United States has urged caution, arguing that reducing borrowing too fast could hinder the fragile recovery.
Scoffing at "endless British preoccupation with the health of the special relationship, Cameron wrote in the Wall Street Journal that he would be "hard-headed and realistic" about U.S. ties and said both countries must also strengthen bonds with rising powers like China and India.
Aides said the Obama-Cameron meeting was also aimed at building on a personal rapport they struck up at last month's Group of 20 summit in Canada.
But BP and its role in the worst offshore oil spill in U.S. history loomed large.
With an eye to British pensioners and other investors at home, Cameron had pledged to defend the embattled oil company in Washington.
Already under fire over the Gulf disaster, BP is in the crosshairs of U.S. lawmakers who want a British inquiry into whether it had a part in the Lockerbie bomber's release.
BP has confirmed it lobbied the British government in 2007 over a prisoner transfer deal with Libya for fear its commercial interests in the country were being damaged. But the company said it was not involved in talks on the release of Megrahi, sentenced to life for the deaths of 270 people, including 189 Americans.
Scottish authorities said they freed the intelligence officer -- over strong U.S. objections -- because he was terminally ill and they believed he had only three months to live. He is still alive in Libya.
Like their predecessors, Obama and Cameron had nothing but praise for their countries' special relationship, a phrase first coined by Winston Churchill after World War Two.
But Cameron has signaled that his new Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition will work pragmatically without giving the appearance of being slavish to U.S. interests.
Obama has also demonstrated a desire to see relations evolve, although he has been careful to avoid offending British sensibilities as he did earlier when he returned a loaned bust of Churchill on display in the Oval Office.
(Additional reporting by Patricia Zengerle, Ross Colvin, Alister Bull and Steve Holland; editing by Patricia Wilson and Mohammad Zargham)
- Tweet this
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Reprints
There is a huge technological gap regarding Hydrology from Geo sciences to be used on fluidic devices in the patenting system updating a century old of common knowledge constantly ignored.
Since 2006 I have been requesting USPTO to assign Hydrogeologists/Soil Physicists to examine fluidic devices and honor common knowledge from my advanced issued patent US 6,766,817. Hydrology is examined by laypeople in the USPTO having no single Hydrologist among about 6,000 ones.
I got surprised when my advanced Hydrology patent was violated by a lazy patent that even do not work and has scientific flaws. Guess what? The Patent Examiner was a Director with near 200 issued patents on her backlog. So, the bias against Hydrology goes upward in the chain power regarding technological development.
Well, I already sent 14 letters to Mr. Obama asking him to honor Hydrology science and respect my PhD textbooks. So far I got no single reply. Perhaps people at the White House do not need to care about Hydrology, but it seems to be missing to handle important hydrological issues, like well spilling.
Hydrological solutions could have clogged that well in the early beginning and golf balls plus shredded tires would not be part of the solution regarding heavy sinking objects with appropriate geometry and specific gravity to seal the well lumen 4.5 km from bottom to top.
The Brits did their pitch and Americans were not in power to alleviate the damage, neither government nor private parties.
This is the way nature works; you always reap what you sow.
God blesses America!
So, this science would teach people in the patenting affairs about a Classical Hydrology from Geo and Agricultural Sciences.
The size of the environmental damage in the Gulf of Mexico may suggest that a new science would fill a huge gap to help all Hydrological affairs, even to provide a better support to do keep going on deep drilling minimizing side-effects and negligence for lack of expertise.
Losing money is not that as bad as destroying wildlife and spoiling the natural landscape.
The damage is far beyond the economy and accounting.






Follow Reuters