Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Devastated by Tornado

A huge tornado tears through an Oklahoma City suburb.  Slideshow 

Photo

Message of humility

A religious fraternity in Rio considers the election of Pope Francis, a confirmation of their beliefs in poverty and simplicity.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Senate breaks deadlock on jobless benefits

Related Topics

People wait in line to enter the City University of New York (CUNY) Big Apple job fair in New York, April 23, 2010. . REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton

People wait in line to enter the City University of New York (CUNY) Big Apple job fair in New York, April 23, 2010. .

Credit: Reuters/Shannon Stapleton

WASHINGTON | Tue Jul 20, 2010 6:39pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Senate on Tuesday cleared the way to extend long-term unemployment benefits, breaking a partisan stalemate that has caused 2.5 million jobless Americans to lose the weekly checks that help them stay afloat.

Minutes after he was sworn in, Senator Carte Goodwin cast his first vote to give his fellow Democrats the 60 they needed to overcome a Republican procedural hurdle and move toward restoring the lapsed jobless benefits.

"It shouldn't take the slimmest of margins to do what's right," Democratic Senator Harry Reid said at a news conference.

The Senate is expected to hold a final vote on Wednesday on the bill that Republicans criticized for deepening the federal deficit.

The House of Representatives could also approve the measure on Wednesday and send it President Barack Obama to sign into law.

"Americans who are struggling to find a job and get back on their feet deserve more than the same political game-playing and failed policies that helped cause this recession," Obama said in a statement.

With congressional elections looming in November, the Senate had been locked in a partisan standoff for weeks over how to pay for extending benefits for those who have been out of work the longest.

Democrats, eager to show voters they are doing all they can to bring down the 9.5 percent unemployment rate, tried to extend the benefits when they expired at the end of May.

But they were blocked by Republicans who said the $34 billion price tag should be covered by cuts elsewhere rather than more borrowing, which would add to a trillion-dollar budget deficit.

"There's no debate in the Senate about whether we should pass a bill -- everyone agrees that we should," Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell said. "This debate is about whether in extending these benefits we should add to the debt or not."

Nearly half of the 15 million Americans out of work have been jobless for more than six months, the highest level of long-term unemployment since the government began keeping track in the 1940s. Nearly a quarter of the unemployed have been out of work for more than a year.

Democrats broke the deadlock shortly after the 36-year-old Goodwin was sworn in to fill the seat of Robert Byrd, who died last month after 57 years in Congress.

Moderate Republicans Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe voted with the Democrats, while centrist Democrat Ben Nelson voted against the extension.

SKIRMISH IN STIMULUS DEBATE

The fight over jobless benefits is the latest skirmish in a broader debate over whether Congress should spend more to stimulate the economy or start making the painful cuts needed to bring down record budget deficits, which hit 9.9 percent of GDP in the last fiscal year.

In normal times, benefits expire after 26 weeks, but after the recession hit in late 2007 Congress expanded the program to cover up to 99 weeks of benefits. The expanded program lapsed at the end of May and 2.5 million people have lost their benefits since then.

The Senate bill would pay retroactive benefits for those people and extend the program through November.

An April report by the San Francisco Federal Reserve concluded that the long-term benefits boosted the unemployment rate by 0.4 percentage points as some of the jobless were less likely to look for work.

But economists generally think unemployment benefits get a good bang for the buck because people who are out of work and scrambling to make ends meet are likely to quickly spend that money, putting it into the economy and stimulating growth.

Though Democrats will likely get a victory on unemployment benefits, much of the rest of their "jobs agenda" in 2010 has been sidelined. Due to unified Republican opposition and doubts within their own ranks, Democrats have been unable to secure more money to avert teacher layoffs, launch new construction projects and help states pay their health-care bills.

Further, the public seems little inclined to give them credit for the job-creation measures they have already passed.

Last year's $862 billion stimulus package has saved more than 3 million jobs, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, but most people think it has had no impact on the economy or actually made it worse, according to a recent CBS News poll.

The $152 billion that the government has spent on additional unemployment benefits since the recession began in late 2007 has boosted GDP by 1.7 percent and supported 1.7 million jobs that otherwise wouldn't be there, according to the liberal-leaning Economic Policy Institute.

The government has also recaptured $92 billion through taxes generated by the additional economic activity and decreased expenditures on food stamps and other safety-net programs, the think tank estimated.

(Additional reporting by Susan Cornwell and Charles Abbott; Editing by Vicki Allen and Stacey Joyce)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (42)
rickw1983 wrote:
We can argue and look for excuses not to pass this bill all month long while the American families hit hardest by this economy suffer and sink deeper and deeper. This country was built on values such as neighbor helping neighbor in time of need. The economy is still bad and unemployment is at a very high percentage. Jobs are scarce. These politicians waste valuable time bickering as they collect their six figure salaries. drive luxury cars and life the good life on tax payer money while the unemployed worry how they will feed and care for their families. I can not see how anyone with the power to help fellow Americans in need would instead choose to deny them the basic necessities of life for ANY reason. Any of these lawmakers who just dig their heels in with a “my way or the highway” stance are failing to do what is right. The right thing would be to work and keep on working to find a way to pass that bill one way or another and help all these American families that fell victim to this great recession. This is the paramount issue at hand, American families many who have served in the military, worked and paid taxes all their lives are now on the brink of total desperation and nearing destitution . Any of these lawmakers who do not do what they can to help pass this bill are not worthy of being called Americans and should be thrown out in shame come November.

Jul 20, 2010 12:09pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
simon-peter wrote:
I do not hate the rich because I am not poor neither. I am quite conservative in general. But as I observe in the past 20 years, I do dislike GOP lawmakers because they (in order to win votes) lie, cheat, fire smoking guns, misinform and fool the public about the truth and facts. If you care to trace how many (big) lies and (big) cheats between democrats and republican politicians, you can find out that the GOP is way ahead of the other parties. GOP please stops using the family value to fool and woo conservative church going folks. Stop saying cutting tax for the general public when the specific tax cut measure is only good for the very rich and will not do much for the general middle class. We need a good opposition party to check the current administration to be honest. We do not want an opposition party to make more lies in order to win votes to get back the administration in the next election.
I believe it is getting harder and harder for GOP to fool people anymore in this INTERNET age. Just like China communist officials (especially those corrupted one) can no longer cover up the facts (fires) as easy as before because of INTERNET. That is why young people chose Obama as President because he does change (like the national health care system and the financial system of this great nation). God bless America.

Jul 20, 2010 12:10pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
guestcomment3 wrote:
Oh Congress better act fast…their Tax-Payer Funded Paid Summer Vacation is coming up soon…wouldn’t it be a bummer if any of the Elected Officials while driving around in their Yachts had to “worry” about the little people and whether or not they were fed? Talk about being treated like a Pet. I hate the Elected Congress this Session. I hate the position they have allowed themselves to be bought by the Banks and stole Trillions from us and then deny us food and housing and any form of hope. Oh Yeah…there’s that word Again….How hollow these last few years have made it sound. I hope they pass the extension or collectively get removed from their seats come November. The banks got their Bailout with a promise of renewed economy and job opportunities for the People…none of that has happened. But the Congress and the Banks still take vacations, still eat well day after day, and still make the same “poor decisions” that if any of the rest of us were to make, would leave us homeless and hungry. But an American Politician is a lier and a theif and the whole world knows it.

Jul 20, 2010 12:49pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.