U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

Afghan soldier killed U.S. trainers after row: ministry

Related Topics

KABUL | Wed Jul 21, 2010 8:26am EDT

KABUL (Reuters) - The killing of two U.S. civilian trainers by an Afghan soldier at a base in northern Afghanistan was the result of a "verbal argument," the Afghan Defense Ministry said Wednesday.

Tuesday, the NATO-led force said two U.S. civilians and an Afghan soldier had been killed in a shooting by another Afghan soldier, possibly an officer, but could not say whether the deaths were an accident or had been intentional.

The shooting happened Tuesday after an argument broke out between an Afghan soldier and U.S. instructors at a training center on an Afghan army base in northern Balkh province, the defense ministry said.

"As a result, two U.S. trainers were killed and one more was wounded," it said, adding the shooter and another Afghan soldier were then killed by return fire.

U.S. embassy spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden confirmed two U.S. citizens had been killed in a shooting incident, but could not release any more details.

A spokesman for the NATO-led force said they were still conducting an investigation with the Afghan Defense Ministry and could not still confirm whether the shooting had resulted from an argument.

The first announcement of the shooting came just as foreign dignitaries and ministers were wrapping up an international conference in Kabul Tuesday, where delegates backed a government plan for Afghan troops to take the lead in securing the whole country by the end of 2014.

The conference also agreed to announce the start of security transition to Afghans in some areas of the country by the end of this year, but many say those deadlines are too ambitious.

Incidents such as Tuesday's shooting can only cast further doubt over the capability and reliability of the Afghan security forces as Western nations seek to hand over responsibility in a bid to withdraw from an increasingly unpopular war.

The shooting was only the latest in a series of similar attacks in recent years highlighting the sometimes testy relations between Afghan troops and their foreign trainers.

Less than two weeks ago, a renegade Afghan trooper gunned down three British soldiers, including two officers, in what was said to be a premeditated attack in the volatile southern province of Helmand.

In November, an Afghan policeman killed five British soldiers at a military compound in southern Helmand province. The Taliban said he was one of their fighters who had infiltrated the force and the incident prompted Britain to look at its vetting procedure for Afghan police.

Four U.S. troops were killed and three were wounded by Afghan soldiers in two other incidents last year, one in the northeast and one just south of Kabul.

The spokesman for NATO-led forces, Lieutenant Colonel Goetz Haffke said he could say yet whether the latest shooting signified a new trend or not.

(Writing by Jonathon Burch; Editing by David Fox)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
txgadfly wrote:
It is extremely dangerous to disrespect an Afghan.

Insensitivity to local culture, and disrespect for it, is a hallmark of US policy. That will always bring trouble from people who fear dishonor more than death.

Jul 21, 2010 12:08pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
MiaAmani wrote:
Can they really be termed as “civilians?”
They are training people how to fight and kill.

Jul 21, 2010 1:06pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Ty520 wrote:
In all honesty, our soldiers should have known better – it like trying to train a wild animal; sure, they can “act” domesticated, but by nature, they are still just a filthy dangerous animal.

These people are incapable of civility – they deserved the Taliban; they deserved Saddam Hussein

Jul 21, 2010 1:19pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.