The dome of the Capitol is reflected in a puddle in Washington February 17, 2012.REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

Another debt ceiling debacle could sink the economy

Last year's Congressional debt standoff hurt consumer confidence more than the collapse of Lehman Brothers, Betsey Johnson and Justin Wolfers write. This time could be worse.  Read more at Counterparties  

Baidu may press claims over hackers: U.S. judge

Related Topics

NEW YORK | Thu Jul 22, 2010 2:02pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - China's leading search engine, Baidu Inc, can sue its U.S.-based domain name service provider, Register.com Inc, for breach of contract, gross negligence and recklessness related to an attack by hackers, a U.S. judge ruled on Thursday.

The order in federal court in New York allows Baidu to proceed with a lawsuit it filed in January.

The January 11 attack prevented Internet users around the world from gaining access to Baidu for five hours and disrupted its operations for two days, according to the lawsuit. Baidu holds the greatest share of the Chinese online search market.

Hackers calling themselves the Iranian Cyber Army hijacked Baidu's home page by gaining unauthorized access to Baidu's account at Register. Weeks before, the same hackers had claimed to do the same thing to popular microblogging site Twitter.

Baidu alleged that a Register.com service representative allowed an intruder, who falsely claimed to be an agent of Baidu, access to Baidu's account even though the intruder provided non-matching security codes.

"If these allegations are proven, then Register failed to follow its own security protocols and essentially handed over control of Baidu's account to an unauthorized intruder, who engaged in cyber vandalism," the written opinion by Judge Denny Chin said in part. "On these facts, a jury surely could find that Register acted in a grossly negligent and reckless manner."

Representatives for Baidu were not answering phones after business hours in China. A representative for Register.com in New York could not immediately be reached to comment.

Baidu's lawsuit made seven claims against Register.com over the security breach, but the judge dismissed five claims, including trademark infringement and aiding and abetting trespass.

Baidu has been steadily expanding its market base since Google Inc threatened to leave China over censorship and hacking concerns.

Baidu shares were trading up 1.1 percent at $74.12 in afternoon dealings.

The case is Baidu Inc v Register.Com Inc, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, No. 10-444.

(Reporting by Grant McCool; Editing by Derek Caney and Gerald E. McCormick)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
China_Lies wrote:
The chinese hack google, steal code and people’s private information, and then sue US firms when Iranian hackers hack chinese websites……

It’s time to end the mercantilist chinese, and their propaganda machine!

Boycott EVERYTHING chinese!!!

Jul 22, 2010 11:07pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
yangguizi wrote:
This is funny. Google was hacked in China, but the criminal Chinese government failed to investigate. It shows that the US is more business friendly than the Chinese. The chinese are just hypocrites who force foreigners to obey their laws while the Chinese have free reign to break their own laws at will, as long as it gives them and edge of foreigners. That is why most of us expats in China have realized that China is the most racist, xenophobic country in the world.

Jul 22, 2010 11:09pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.