The dome of the Capitol is reflected in a puddle in Washington February 17, 2012.REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

Another debt ceiling debacle could sink the economy

Last year's Congressional debt standoff hurt consumer confidence more than the collapse of Lehman Brothers, Betsey Johnson and Justin Wolfers write. This time could be worse.  Read more at Counterparties  

Recommended Newsletters

Reuters U.S. Top News
A quick-fix on the day's news published with Reuters videos and award-winning news photography and delivered at your choice of one of four times during the day.
Reuters Deals Today
The latest Reuters articles on M&A, IPOs, private equity, hedge funds and regulatory updates delivered to your inbox each day.
Reuters Technology Report
Your daily briefing on the latest tech developments from around the world from Reuters expert tech correspondents.

Job creation trumps deficit reduction in poll

NEW YORK | Thu Jul 22, 2010 2:16pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - American voters overwhelmingly say lowering unemployment is more important than reducing the federal budget deficit, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released on Thursday.

The poll, conducted July 13-19, showed that 64 percent of respondents thought reducing the jobless rate should be a bigger priority versus 30 percent who favored focusing on cutting the budget deficit.

A majority of Republicans -- 58 percent to 38 percent -- also said reducing unemployment was more important, the poll said. Republicans have accused President Barack Obama's administration of expanding the deficit through overspending.

The federal budget deficit for 2010 is expected to be about $1.4 trillion. The U.S. unemployment rate was 9.5 percent in June.

The poll came amid a debate between those who favor more stimulus spending to boost the sluggish U.S. economy and fiscal conservatives who plan to make deficit reduction a rallying cry in November's midterm congressional elections.

But 49 percent of voters said Obama was irresponsible for spending too much, with 45 percent disagreeing, while 53 percent said government was doing too much better left to businesses and individuals, with 39 percent disagreeing.

Seventy-nine percent believed the United States was still in a recession, up from 74 percent in May, and 52 percent said the economy was not beginning to recover. Twenty-three percent said the economy was getting better, 31 percent said it was getting worse and 44 percent saw no change.

"The public seems to be reassessing the view held through the winter and spring, when they thought economic conditions were lousy but could see the light at the end of the tunnel. Now they aren't seeing that light," Peter A. Brown, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute, said in a statement.

While 41 percent of those surveyed said they trusted Obama to handle the economy, 42 percent trusted congressional Republicans more. Independent voters, who were important to Obama's 2008 election, favored congressional Republicans 42 percent to 35 percent.

Voters disapproved of the way Obama was handling the economy by 56 percent to 39 percent. Among independents, 61 percent disapproved compared to 34 percent who approved.

But more people still blamed former President George W. Bush for the current economic conditions -- 53 percent versus 25 percent who blamed Obama.

"Wall Street may be debating whether the country is at risk of a double-dip recession, but Main Street thinks the original one never ended. So far, voters blame Bush more than Obama, but it's not clear how long that view will last," Brown said.

The poll surveyed 2,181 registered voters nationwide and had a margin of error of plus or minus 2.1 percentage points.

(Editing by Paul Simao)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
MacByrd wrote:
How can a government create jobs? It can create conditions that are favorable for new hires, but, without grossly increasing the debt, the national or state governments cannot create jobs. I think the answer lies in innovation in the way that companies hire and manage employees on a contingent and contract basis. New companies are emerging that will enable companies to easily use this new business model, gain competitive flexibility, shorten the hiring cycle, and save tremendous amounts of recruiting costs. Look next week for one such company to enter controlled beta testing for state unemployement offices,both small and large corporations, and all individuals looking for work – FTE, PT, Contract, Contingent – any kind of work and at any level. Look for it…

Jul 24, 2010 11:42am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.