North Korea declares "sacred war" on U.S. and South

1 of 10. Sailors stand in formation as the USS George Washington aircraft carrier arrives in Busan, south Korea, July 21, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Jared Hill/U.S. Navy//Handout

SEOUL | Sat Jul 24, 2010 12:01pm EDT

SEOUL (Reuters) - North Korea said on Saturday it would begin a "sacred war" against the United States and South Korea at "any time necessary" based on its nuclear deterrent, in response to "reckless" military exercises by the allies.

North Korea has driven tensions on the Korean peninsula to new heights after the South accused the North of sinking one of its warships in March, killing 46, and took steps to boost its defense including massive military drills with the United States.

Pyongyang customarily voiced shrill anger in the past when the allies conducted exercises, but U.S. officials said further provocations are possible, especially as the North tries to build political momentum for succession of power to Kim Jong-il's son.

U.S. and South Korean militaries begin large-scale naval and aerial drills on Sunday with a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier taking part and they have additional exercises planned in August.

"The army and people of the DPRK will start a retaliatory sacred war of their own style based on nuclear deterrent any time necessary in order to counter the U.S. imperialists and the South Korean puppet forces deliberately pushing the situation to the brink of a war," the North's National Defense Commission said.

DPRK is short for Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

"All these war maneuvers are nothing but outright provocations aimed to stifle the DPRK by force of arms to all intents and purposes," the powerful commission said in a statement carried by the North's official KCNA news agency.

It again denied that the country was behind the sinking of South Korea's corvette Cheonan, and said the planned military drills were "as reckless an act as waking up a sleeping tiger."

SIX-PARTY TALKS

Washington brushed off the latest threat and said it had no interest in getting into a war of words. "What we need from North Korea is fewer provocative words and more constructive action," State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley said.

The North escaped rebuke by the U.N. Security Council, which condemned the attack in a statement early in July without directly blaming the Pyongyang government.

An official speaking on the sidelines of a multilateral Asian forum in Vietnam last week said the U.S.-South Korean drills also violated the spirit of the U.N. statement, which called for dialogue to ease tensions.

North Korea has called for the resumption of six-party nuclear disarmament talks that it had boycotted since late 2008, a move analysts said was an attempt to put the Cheonan incident behind and win lucrative aid through a deal with the South, the United States, Japan, Russia and China.

North Korea again on Saturday said that it was prepared to engage in talks with regional powers and take strong physical actions against any sanctions.

"If the U.S. puts sword to us, we will put sword to them, which is how we counteract. We are ready for both talks and wars. We are not the one who would be surprised by military threats or sanctions," North Korean foreign ministry spokesperson said in a statement carried by KCNA.

The United States and South Korea have rejected the call and said Pyongyang must first prove that it is genuinely interested in change by first apologizing for sinking the Cheonan.

Following talks in Seoul on Wednesday, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced fresh sanctions on North Korea aimed at freezing its assets earned from illicit activities including arms trade and cut off the flow of cash to its leaders.

(Additional reporting by Arshad Mohammed in Washington, and Yeo-jung Chang and Cho Mee-young in Seoul; Editing by Sugita Katyal)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (39)
andyexpress wrote:
i think world dont need two police forces.one is enough, which is UN.we all should respect that.

Jul 24, 2010 6:05am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Obama is going to plunge the world into war. Someone with no experience in the military, and far from the front lines, he is cavalier with the troop deployments, and saber rattling. His very first act was to send significantly more troops to Afghanistan, and expand the war into Pakistan, Somalia, and Yemen, among other places. Whether or not it was the right thing to do, that’s what he did, and we are noting it now, for the purposes of discussing our present threat level. Obama has put America on the precipice of war with North Korea, if not Iraq, as well. I don’t know if it was intentional, or if it simply couldn’t be avoided. This is an annual exercise, but circumstances being what they are, perhaps taking the very aggressive stance, while simultaneously threatening china is simply irresponsible brinkmanship. America is not very popular right now, especially in the Islamic world, in spite of Obama’s repeated, and sometimes inappropriate overtures- perhaps its all the Muslims he is killing around the globe? He is alienating virtually all of America’s allies for no apparent reason, accept that they are countries run by people which, as we have all learned by now, are not part Obama’s favorite demographic group. Obama has also alienated most of the electorate, so maybe he feels that he needs no one but himself, and that, as George Bush demonstrated, is a dangerous thing indeed. It’s certainly a mystery why someone would push a clearly demented, and unstable Kim Jong Il into a corner like this. The world has seen what the Ayatollah, his puppet government, and his creepy paramilitary think of the voters. If the Iranian government treats its own people this way, how likely are they to drop a nuclear bomb on people they really despise? Scary world we are living in, and China could have made a really big difference, but I guess they too have decided that no one but themselves are needed, and like the former Soviet Union, they are expanding rapidly. Russia seems to be coming around, a little late to make much difference though, unfortunately. The real game changer was AQ Khan, of Pakistan, and he could very well go down as the primary enabler of demented, or murderous dictators that start a nuclear war.

Jul 24, 2010 7:04am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Groundhog wrote:
How can a Godless Communist state declare a “sacred war”? These people are very confused.

And since they are a uniformed, standard army, our tactics for conventional war will prevail, if necessary.

I do recognize thier vast numerbers of army soldiers, but a sustained war requires a vast amount of food, which they do not have.

Jul 24, 2010 7:27am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.