Mental health experts ask: Will anyone be normal?

Related Topics

A patient watches TV at the activity room at a mental hospital of Changzhi, north China's Shanxi province May 18, 2007. REUTERS/Stringer

A patient watches TV at the activity room at a mental hospital of Changzhi, north China's Shanxi province May 18, 2007.

Credit: Reuters/Stringer

LONDON | Tue Jul 27, 2010 5:23pm EDT

LONDON (Reuters) - An updated edition of a mental health bible for doctors may include diagnoses for "disorders" such as toddler tantrums and binge eating, experts say, and could mean that soon no-one will be classed as normal.

Leading mental health experts gave a briefing on Tuesday to warn that a new edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), which is being revised now for publication in 2013, could devalue the seriousness of mental illness and label almost everyone as having some kind of disorder.

Citing examples of new additions like "mild anxiety depression," "psychosis risk syndrome," and "temper dysregulation disorder," they said many people previously seen as perfectly healthy could in future be told they are ill.

"It's leaking into normality. It is shrinking the pool of what is normal to a puddle," said Til Wykes of the Institute of Psychiatry at Kings College London.

The DSM is published by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) and contains descriptions, symptoms, and other criteria for diagnosing mental disorders. It is seen as the global diagnostic bible for the field of mental health medicine.

The criteria are designed to provide clear definitions for professionals who treat patients with mental disorders, and for researchers and pharmaceutical drug companies seeking to develop new ways of treating them.

Wykes and colleagues Felicity Callard, also of Kings' Institute of Psychiatry, and Nick Craddock of Cardiff University's department of psychological medicine and neurology, said many in the psychiatric community are worried that the further the guidelines are expanded, the more likely it will become that nobody will be classed as normal any more.

"Technically, with the classification of so many new disorders, we will all have disorders," they said in a joint statement. "This may lead to the belief that many more of us 'need' drugs to treat our 'conditions' -- (and) many of these drugs will have unpleasant or dangerous side effects."

The scientists said "psychosis risk syndrome" diagnosis was particularly worrying, since it could falsely label young people who may only have a small risk of developing an illness.

"It's a bit like telling 10 people with a common cold that they are "at risk for pneumonia syndrome" when only one is likely to get the disorder," Wykes told the briefing.

The American Psychiatric Association did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The scientists gave examples from the previous revision to the DSM, which was called DSM 4 and included broader diagnoses and categories for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism and childhood bipolar disorders.

This, they said, had "contributed to three false epidemics" of these conditions, particularly in the United States.

"During the last decade, how many doctors were harangued by worried parents into giving drugs like Ritalin to children who didn't really need it?," their statement asked.

Millions of people across the world, many of them children, take ADHD drugs including Novartis' Ritalin, which is known generically as methylphenidate, and similar drugs such as Shire Plc's Adderall and Vyvanse. In the United States alone, sales of these drugs was about $4.8 billion in 2008.

Wykes and Callard published a comment in The Journal of Mental Health expressing their concern about the upcoming DSM revision and highlighting another 10 or more papers in the same journal from other scientists who were also worried. DSM 5 is due to be published in May 2013.

(Editing by Peter Graff)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (23)
itzajob wrote:
More diagnoses equals more customers, er, patients.

Jul 27, 2010 12:17pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Busterboy wrote:
I am a college student. I have just finished my 3rd psychiatry course. This is NO JOKE! My last instructor is a Dr. She Warned the class that because of the insurance, she has to assign a mental disorder to everybody she treats; other-wise the insurance will not pay her for the therapy session.
TO put it Bluntly: Anyone and Everyone who seeks help from a mental health provider is going to be STIGMATIZED as Mentally Ill for the rest of their lives!
Life can be tough enough with out being labeled as a Deranged Mad Dog!

Jul 27, 2010 2:49pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
crusader wrote:
I have been a mental health patient since 1990. I was diagnosed with mild cronic depression. I used the same medication for 19yrs. A year after my diagnosis I revield my condition to my employer who had a bout of depression as a reaction to medication. My employer said that if he would have known about the depression when I was first diagnosed that I would have been fired. The reason I was secure in devulging my condition was that he had experienced depression. The only reason that worked was that he had the experience. I could not have explained the condition to anyone who doesn’t experience it. Advances in medications to treat mental illness have greatly advanced thru the last 20yrs. The unfortunate fact is that those not afflicted jump to the conclusion that the person who is afflicted is crazy and non-functional. In my experience there is no way to establish an equation for normalcy versus mentally ill. If a person follows a good disipline in taking of the prescribed medications where he functions vertually well in society does he not reflect the term “normal”? NORMAL will always remain relative to the individual when it comes to guaging mental illness. As the medical community make advances in the study of the brain and thought processes,it is most important that those of us who suffer mental illness communicate with scientist to better our treatment.

Jul 27, 2010 3:33pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.