Palestinians set to reject direct talks for now

RAMALLAH, West Bank Wed Jul 28, 2010 8:20am EDT

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas speaks to reporters after meeting with Jordan's King Abdullah at the Royal Palace in Amman July 26, 2010. REUTERS/Ali Jarekji

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas speaks to reporters after meeting with Jordan's King Abdullah at the Royal Palace in Amman July 26, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Ali Jarekji

Related Topics

RAMALLAH, West Bank (Reuters) - Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas will tell the Arab League on Thursday indirect talks with Israel have not progressed enough to justify face-to-face peace negotiations, a Palestinian official said on Wednesday.

"Abbas will tell them that, until this moment, there is nothing to convince us to go to direct talks," the official told Reuters. "There is nothing new."

Resisting U.S. pressure, the Palestinian leader has said he first wants indirect talks to make progress, specifically on the issues of the security and borders of a Palestinian state he aims to found on land occupied by Israel since 1967.

He will brief the Arab League's peace process committee in Cairo on Thursday on the state of the current U.S.-mediated indirect talks that began in May after the forum's approval of a four-month timeframe, due to end in September. U.S. President Barack Obama's Middle East envoy, George Mitchell, last met Abbas on July 17 in Ramallah. Palestinian officials said that at that session, Abbas turned down a U.S. request to begin direct negotiations.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says he wants to begin direct talks with the Palestinians immediately.

But the Palestinian official said: "We will tell the Arabs that the Americans brought nothing with them. We will most likely continue the remaining two months (of indirect talks) and see what happens."

SETTLEMENT FREEZE

Obama, seeking to revive the Middle East peace process, said earlier this month he hoped direct talks would begin by September -- before Israel's 10-month partial freeze on Jewish settlement building in the West Bank ends.

Netanyahu has voiced reluctance to extend the moratorium, which could further complicate U.S. efforts to get Abbas to the negotiating table.

Netanyahu heads a coalition that includes pro-settler parties, including one led by Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, who said on Wednesday there was "no place for any moratorium after 25 September."

The fate of Jewish settlements built on Israeli-occupied land is one of the main issues confronting the diplomatic process.

Abbas, a central figure in years of negotiations aimed at creating a Palestinian state alongside Israel, is seen as wary of face-to-face talks with a right-wing Israeli leader he doubts is willing to make an offer the Palestinians can accept.

Israeli cabinet minister Isaac Herzog, a member of the center-left Labor Party, called the Israeli-Palestinian impasse a "chicken-and-egg" situation.

"Abu Mazen (Abbas) says: 'I don't want to enter direct negatiations until I know what the final result will be.'," Herzog told Israel Radio.

"Netanyahu says: 'Enter direct negatiations and I will also tell you what the final result will be.' Each one looks at it opposite, and we are in a sort of political trap."

Netanyahu, who has pledged to take "political risks" for peace but has yet to announce promised confidence-building gestures toward the Palestinians, says Abbas is wasting time.

Abbas, head of an administration that depends on Western aid, has surprised many observers with his resistance to U.S. pressure. The 75-year old is under domestic pressure to avoid more negotiations in which he is by far the weaker player.

(Writing by Tom Perry; Editing by Louise Ireland)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
786daktari wrote:
After watching a recently leaked video (1) in which Netanyahu brags about how he sabotaged the Oslo Accords, anyone sane being would have to think ten times over before trying to strike a deal with this moron (2).

(1) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6KLFrye9Xk&feature=player_embedded

(2)http://www.middleeastmonitor.org.uk/news/middle-east/1338-netanyahu-shot-himself-in-the-foot

Jul 28, 2010 10:28am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Hmmm….Well, historically, every time Israel has been willing to talk, ready to deal, the Palistinian leader has found one reason or another to avoid the negotiation. Understand, there are plenty, even many, citizens of Israel that would prefer open combat to giving up any of the land conquered in the ‘67 war. My take is that when leaders of good will are willing to openly negotiate, things of historical proportions can happen. Until the Palistinians prefer peace to war, nothing will change. Were I in the place of Netanyahu, I’d wash my hands of the whole mess, and wait for the next generation of Palistinian leaders that have more of their lifetime before them than behind them. Were I the US Prez, I’d bring Mitchell home, and cut off all aid to the Palistinians. Perhaps we have unwittingly been enabling the dithering behavior of the Palistinians.

Jul 28, 2010 5:00pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
goyla wrote:
Stick to your stance Abbas! Avoid more of the same old game. Don’t be pressured to ‘negotiate’ with Netanyahu. It is Israel which has consistently refused to honor previous United Nations Declarations, Oslo Accords etc. That is why this situation has dragged on for so long and at such a high cost in every way. Israel has ‘lost the plot’ because globally the history of the Zionist colonization has been exposed. No more duplicitous, arrogant, political manipulation, media propaganda and bullying will work. Anyone interested in researching the ‘historical’ basis of this ongoing dishonest process would understand why there can be no ‘urgency’ to resolve issues NOW through direct talks. There have been many resolutions put forward that Israel has not complied with, while continuing illegal land grabbing. It’s really very simple, just review and redress the previous negotiations and UN Declarations etc, right back to where Israel first dishonored their agreements. The International Court of Justice should be ruling on this. But of course Israel will continue to apply pressure any way it can, as outmoded and transparent as it’s methods are. Einstein and many other respected Jews warned the USA about getting involved with fascist, Zionist politics. It’s been nothing but an apartheid system imposed on the Palestinians from the outset. Many Jewish Israelis (the ones who aren’t indoctrinated into the ‘us and them’ fear mentality) want an honest future, one where PEACE is possible. This will only happen when the old ‘dirty’ politics no longer dominate and arouse global condemnation. There’s growing support on the world’s ground for boycotts, divestment and sanctions against Israel, just as was imposed on South Africa’s Apartheid government. So hang in there Abbas, refusing to engage in direct talks is a very active stand to take. Just common sense really!

Jul 28, 2010 7:48pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.