A handout photograph distributed by Syria's national news agency SANA on May 22,2013, show detained men, blindfolded and handcuffed, described by SANA as "terrorists fighters", a term commonly used to describe rebels fighting to topple President Bashar al-Assad, in Qusair, near Homs.    SANA/Handout via Reuters

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more 

Photo

Devastated by Tornado

A huge tornado tears through an Oklahoma City suburb.  Slideshow 

Photo

The drone wars

The frontlines of America's covert drone program.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Madoff trustee sues family entities

Related Topics

Irving Picard. the bankruptcy trustee in the Bernard Madoff case, speaks to the press outside the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New York February 2, 2010. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid

Irving Picard. the bankruptcy trustee in the Bernard Madoff case, speaks to the press outside the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New York February 2, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Brendan McDermid

NEW YORK | Thu Jul 29, 2010 8:50pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - The trustee liquidating Bernard Madoff's investment firm late on Thursday filed three lawsuits against entities affiliated with family members of the imprisoned swindler, accusing them of taking nearly $200 million of investor cash to fund "lavish lifestyles."

The lawsuits filed in the U.S. bankruptcy court in Manhattan collectively seek to recover more than $30 million, and are the latest effort by the trustee Irving Picard to recoup assets to be distributed to victims of Madoff's estimated $65 billion Ponzi scheme.

One of the cases was filed against a family fund, another against a business that owned oil and gas properties, and a third was against a trading-related business.

In the complaint against the family fund, Picard accused Madoff's brother Peter, sons Andrew and Mark, and niece Shana of failing to perform their senior management duties at Bernard L Madoff Investment Securities LLC, the center of the patriarch's fraud.

"While acting in complete dereliction of their management responsibilities to BLMIS, Peter, Andrew, Mark and Shana were also among the unlawful recipients of close to $200 million of BLMIS customer funds which they used to fund lavish lifestyles," lawyers for Picard alleged in one of the lawsuits.

Bernard Madoff, 72, pleaded guilty in March 2009 to running a decades-long Ponzi scheme. He is serving a 150-year sentence in a North Carolina federal prison.

Martin Flumenbaum, a lawyer for Mark and Andrew Madoff, said: "With respect to Mark and Andrew, the lawsuits are without merit, both factually and legally."

Lawyers for Peter and Shana Madoff did not immediately return requests for comment.

Picard has said that through March 31, he had recovered more than $1.5 billion of assets for Madoff victims.

The cases, all filed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York, are Picard v. Madoff Technologies LLC, No. 10-03483; Picard v. Madoff Energy Holdings LLC et al, No. 10-03484; and Picard v. Madoff Family LLC, No. 10-03485.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Additional reporting by Michael Erman; editing by Carol Bishopric)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
STORYBURN17 wrote:
Isn’t the $1.3 billion he has recovered enough?

Jul 29, 2010 9:31pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
FirePilot wrote:
The entire Family five levels down needs to be stood against a wall and shot. I would buy the bulletts had not they raped me.

Jul 29, 2010 12:36am EDT  --  Report as abuse
ssrj wrote:
It amazing that the family who has lived off other people’s money for so long can keep all the ill gotten wealth and there are no laws to punish them. The defense that none of them knew about the robbery is ridiculous.

Jul 30, 2010 1:46am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.