Pakistan spy chief scraps UK trip on "terror" remarks

Related Topics

Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron addresses the media in Ankara in this July 27, 2010 file photo. REUTERS/Umit Bektas

Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron addresses the media in Ankara in this July 27, 2010 file photo.

Credit: Reuters/Umit Bektas

ISLAMABAD/LONDON | Sat Jul 31, 2010 2:23pm EDT

ISLAMABAD/LONDON (Reuters) - Pakistan's spy chief has canceled a trip to Britain, a spokesman said on Saturday, but Islamabad played down a row over remarks by British Prime Minister David Cameron suggesting Pakistan was not doing enough to fight terrorism.

A spokesman for the Inter-Service Intelligence (ISI) agency said on Saturday that senior intelligence officials, including ISI head Lieutenant General Ahmad Shuja Pasha, would not go to London on Monday as planned for counter-terrorism talks.

But President Asif Ali Zardari will still visit Britain next week, a government spokesman said.

Cameron, speaking in Pakistan's rival India on Wednesday, told Islamabad that it must not become a base for militants and "promote the export of terror" across the globe.

A Pakistani foreign ministry spokesman said this week his country had been "saddened" by Cameron's remarks.

Information Minister Qamar Zaman Kaira, already in Britain ahead of Cameron's remarks, said the British prime minister's remarks were "contrary to the facts" and "not in good taste."

"But our reasonable reaction is ... we will discuss this matter at the highest level of the leadership and give them the facts," he told a news conference in London.

"If we go back into history, our relations with the UK are very good. And we want to keep up those relations, strengthen those relations," he said.

Pakistan's help is crucial for U.S. and Western efforts to stabilize neighboring Afghanistan.

Cameron's remarks came days after classified U.S. military reports published on the WikiLeaks website detailed concerns that the ISI had aided the Taliban while Pakistan's government was taking billions of dollars in U.S. aid.

MILITANT TIES IN SPOTLIGHT

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, on a recent visit to Pakistan, said she believed al Qaeda leaders were still hiding in Pakistan and that some elements in the Pakistani government knew where they were.

Cameron's remarks appear to have further annoyed Pakistan, which has launched a large military offensive against al Qaeda and Taliban militants in its northwestern provinces bordering Afghanistan.

The ISI spokesman said more than 2,500 Pakistani soldiers had been killed and more than 4,000 wounded in battles against militants since the U.S.-led war on Afghanistan in 2001.

More than 30,000 civilians have been killed or wounded in the same period, in addition to over 100 ISI officials, the spokesman added.

India accuses Pakistan of supporting militants operating on its soil and peace talks between the two countries have been deadlocked since 2008 attacks in Mumbai.

Pakistan's economic losses have been estimated by the government at more than $68 billion since the U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan and toppling of the Taliban government in 2001.

Cameron, asked by British broadcasters whether he regretted damaging relations with Pakistan ahead of the meeting, he said: "I don't accept that they have been damaged ... I look forward to discussing these and other issues (with Zardari)."

(Editing by Jon Hemming)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
Bludde wrote:
Cameron said it like it is. Pakistan is the global center of Terrorism (to quote a famous CNN/Time moderator) and Kayani/Pasha are directly involved in efforts to destabilize Afghanistan in order to gain control and use Pashtuns to attack India. Any doubts were long since erased by the author/columnist Ahmed Rashad writing from within Pakistan who wrote an excellent treatise on the disastrous “Kargil affair” that was spear-headed by Musharraf himself when he was Army COS. The UK is at risk because it is Haven to millions of Pakistanis. Even a fraction of 1% radicalised could inflict severe damage within the UK borders.

Jul 31, 2010 9:57am EDT  --  Report as abuse
bobknob wrote:
bizarre how political leaders in the middle-east conduct diplomacy like petulant children

pakistan has clearly been supporting terrorist groups against india for decades, and it’d be no surprise at all if they are trying to jockey for influence in afghanistan

Jul 31, 2010 12:00pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
SChandra wrote:
I am India’s expert in strategic defence and the father of India’s strategic program, including the Integrated Guided Missiles Development Program. I have shown in my blog titled ‘Nuclear Supremacy For India Over U.S.’, which can be found by a Google search with the title, that all terrorism and insurgencies in the Indian subcontinent and in much of the rest of the world is sponsored by the C.I.A. Both Pakistan’s ISI and India’s RAW (Research and Analysis Wing) function as branches of the C.I.A. and participate in terrorism and insurgencies throughout the Subcontinent, under direction of the C.I.A. Yes, the ISI secretly supports the Taliban but it does so under direction from the C.I.A. whose modus operandi is support for ALL sides of a conflict to control the course of the conflict in service of its own goals. The goal of the U.S. invasion and occupation of Afghanistan and partial occupation of Pakistan is eventual occupation and overt colonial rule over the Subcontinent as a whole. This will not be permitted and all those participating in this enterprise, including the U.K., will be duly punished; see my blog. The document leak currently in the news has been made in preparation for abandonment of this goal and withdrawal from Afghanistan because of steps I have already taken for the nuclear destruction of New Delhi and then the coast-to-coast destruction of the United States by India with 5,000 thermonuclear warheads and extermination of its population; see my blog.

Jul 31, 2010 3:22pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.