The dome of the Capitol is reflected in a puddle in Washington February 17, 2012.REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

Another debt ceiling debacle could sink the economy

Last year's Congressional debt standoff hurt consumer confidence more than the collapse of Lehman Brothers, Betsey Johnson and Justin Wolfers write. This time could be worse.  Read more at Counterparties  

U.S. dietary supplements often contaminated: report

Store worker walks past rows of herbal, vitamin and mineral pill products at a suburban pharmacy in Sydney, Australia in this April 29, 2003 file photo. REUTERS/David Gray

Store worker walks past rows of herbal, vitamin and mineral pill products at a suburban pharmacy in Sydney, Australia in this April 29, 2003 file photo.

Credit: Reuters/David Gray

WASHINGTON | Tue Aug 3, 2010 1:46pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Many popular dietary supplements contain ingredients that may cause cancer, heart problems, liver or kidney damage, but U.S. stores sell them anyway and Americans spend millions on them, according to Consumer Reports.

The consumer magazine published a report on Tuesday highlighting the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's lack of power to regulate such supplements, and said the agency rarely uses what little power it does have.

The report from the influential group urged Congress to speed up small moves toward giving the agency more clout, especially in regulating supplements.

Despite the "natural" labels carried by many of the supplements, many are contaminated.

Yet Americans flock to take them, according to the magazine, citing the Nutrition Business Journal as saying the market was worth $26.7 billion in 2009.

"Of the more than 54,000 dietary supplement products in the Natural Medicines Comprehensive Database, only about a third have some level of safety and effectiveness that is supported by scientific evidence," the report reads.

In addition, the FDA has not inspected any supplement factories in China, even though the agency set up field offices there starting in 2008, Consumer Reports said.

The organization pointed to 12 supplement ingredients in particular that it said could be dangerous: aconite, bitter orange, chaparral, colloidal silver, coltsfoot, comfrey, country mallow, germanium, greater celandine, kava, lobelia, and yohimbe.

Potential dangers include liver and kidney damage, heart rhythm disorders and unhealthy blood pressure levels, it said.

INDUSTRY FRIENDLY LAWS

The group is critical of the 1994 Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act or DSHEA, which it describes as industry friendly and which prevents the FDA from regulating supplements in the same way as it regulates prescription medications.

The Federal Trade Commission regulates the marketing of herbal supplements, whose makers are not allowed to claim they treat medical conditions.

The FDA has banned only one supplement ingredient -- ephedrine alkaloids -- although it has persuaded many companies to pull their products off the market.

"Supplements are marketed with very seductive and sometimes overblown sales pitches for increasing your performance in the bedroom, slimming down, or boosting your athletic prowess," said Nancy Metcalf, senior program editor for the magazine.

"And consumers are easily lulled into believing that supplements can do no harm because they're 'natural'," Metcalf said in a statement.

"However, some natural ingredients can be hazardous, and on top of that the FDA has repeatedly found hazardous ingredients, including synthetic prescription drugs, in supplements."

In May, the Government Accountability Office found that sellers of ginseng, Echinacea and other herbal and dietary supplements often tell consumers the pills can cure cancer or replace prescription medications.

Experts at the Institute of Medicine said earlier this year the FDA needs to use the same strict standards to regulate supplements as it uses for drugs, and the GAO said the FDA should ask Congress for more power to regulate supplements.

(Editing by Todd Eastham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
Terry5003 wrote:
It is interesting that many drugs the FDA approves were initially discovered as an herb. The drug company extracts what they believe is the active nutrient and make it a patented drug so they can charge enormous amounts of money. The FDA may say the same herb is not safe to use.
The FDA has tried several times to control supplements. Control to the level of needing a prescription from a doctor.
Amounts so small to be worthless.
Does conflict of interest cross anyones mind about the FDA controlling the competition to their multi billion dollar domain.
How many drugs have been taken off the market after FDA approval that have killed scores of people?
I have not heard that from any supplement yet.
So may be the supplement companies should control the drug companies.

Aug 03, 2010 11:07am EDT  --  Report as abuse
CalGal wrote:
Actually, Terry5003, my first reaction to the news article was total cynicism. It seems that the FDA can’t stand not having control of such a lucrative market. I wonder if Big Pharma, FDA’s good friend, has a hand in creating the latest flap over those bad, bad vitamins. Let’s not talk about Vioxx, Baycor, Avandia, those drugs that were rushed to market with negative information suppressed, which did harm and kill people. If the government gave a rat’s about health care, we would not have 47 million uninsured. Puhleeeze!!!
Ephedrine was dangerous and is now no longer sold. The system seems to work. It seems, as usual, to be all about power and money.

Aug 03, 2010 11:50am EDT  --  Report as abuse
wrote:
Consumer Reports has long stood on the wrong side of the supplement issues, saying certain supplements don’t work, when there are quality placebo-controlled studies showing effectiveness, and basically being on the side of the medical establishment that is in bed with the drug industry. In this article they group the fringe “supplements” with the legitimate dietary supplements like vitamins and minerals without doing what they do in their testing and intelligently differentiating between the various types of supplements. Yes, the bodybuilding supplements are fraught with exaggerations and have at times included ingredients that dietary supplement manufacturers and quality vendors like Whole Foods Market will not sell. Yes, there are odd fringe companies, again that Whole Foods will not allow in their stores. But grouping all “supplements” together won’t solve the problem of cleaning up the fringe “bad” supplements. Even as it is, the US Poison Control Centers 10-year reports consistently show no deaths from vitamins, 2000+ deaths from OTC drugs like aspirin and over a million deaths from doctor prescribed drugs. Dietary supplements are requlated to the extent FDA needs to regulate them. FDA needs far tougher regulations for drugs because they kill, while dietary supplements are relatively harmless. See: http://www.michaelmooney.net/NoDeathsFromVitamins.html. See also the corrections to articles like the Consumer Reports article at: http://www.michaelmooney.net/#Corrections
Michael Mooney
www.michaelmooney.net

Aug 03, 2010 12:43pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.