Factbox: Reaction to ruling on California's gay marriage ban

Related Topics

LOS ANGELES | Wed Aug 4, 2010 5:44pm EDT

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - A federal judge in San Francisco on Wednesday struck down California's ban on gay marriage, which was approved by voters in November 2008 and upheld by the state Supreme Court in May 2009.

Following are reactions to the ruling:

* California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger:

"For the hundreds of thousands of Californians in gay and lesbian households who are managing their day-to-day lives, this decision affirms the full legal protections and safeguards I believe everyone deserves," Schwarzenegger said in a statement released by his office.

"At the same time, it provides an opportunity for all Californians to consider our history of leading the way to the future, and our growing reputation of treating all people and their relationships with equal respect and dignity," Schwarzenegger said.

"Today's decision is by no means California's first milestone, nor our last, on America's road to equality and freedom for all people."

* Jerry Brown, California's attorney general and a candidate for governor in November:

"In striking down Proposition 8, Judge Walker came to the same conclusion I did when I declined to defend it: Proposition 8 violates the equal protection guarantee of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution by taking away the right of same-sex couples to marry, without a sufficient governmental interest," Brown said in a statement.

* Ramona Ripston, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California:

"This decision affirms that in America, we don't treat people differently because of their sexual orientation," Ripston said. "We rejoice at today's decision but there's a long road ahead toward establishing true marriage equality for same-sex couples."

* Wendy Wright, president of Concerned Women for America

"Judge Walker's decision goes far beyond homosexual 'marriage' to strike at the heart of our representative democracy," Wright said in a prepared statement.

She added: "Marriage is not a political toy. It is too important to treat as a means for already powerful people to gain preferred status or acceptance. Marriage between one man and one woman undergirds a stable society and cannot be replaced by any other living arrangement.

"Citizens of California voted to uphold marriage because they understood the sacred nature of marriage and that homosexual activists use same-sex 'marriage' as a political juggernaut to indoctrinate young children in schools to reject their parent's values and to harass, sue and punish people who disagree."

*Talk show host and comedian Ellen DeGeneres, who lives in California and is married to a woman:

"Equality won!," she said in a Twitter update after the ruling.,

* John Eastman, former dean of Chapman University Law School and an unsuccessful Republican candidate for California attorney general:

"Judge Walker's claim that the definition of marriage, as has been known for centuries, doesn't even pass rational basis review directly (and) conflicts with Justice O'Connor's opinion in Lawrence v. Texas, as well as common sense.

"The equal protection clause requires that we treat similarly situated people similarly, but there is no question that homosexual and heterosexual couples are differently situated with respect to procreation, one of the purposes of marriage."

* Luke Otterstad, a 24-year-old Sacramento man who stood outside the courthouse with his 22-year-old fiancé, Nadia Shayka:

The couple, who oppose gay marriage, were wearing T-shirts that read "bride" and "groom."

"I'm very upset. I feel like I don't live in America."

(Reporting by Dan Whitcomb and Dan Levine; Editing by Cynthia Osterman)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
nmoss wrote:
It seems that the constitution of the Unites States is meaningless. We now have the judicial branch making laws. The voters seem to have lost the power to vote on what what is right and wrong. What has happened to our rights as citizens?

Aug 04, 2010 6:05pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
IonOtter wrote:
“We now have the judicial branch making laws.”

Nooooo? We have the judicial branch doing their job and deciding that BAD LAWS are unconstitutional. Just as they’re supposed to be doing. Just as they SHOULD have been doing YEARS ago.

Aug 04, 2010 7:02pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
cicadace73 wrote:
Marriage is a religious institution defined in the Bible as between a man and woman. Prop 8 is not a ban on gay marriage its a definition of what marriage is, namely between a man and a woman. Most gay folks are not religious or want any part of it so why is marriage a big issue to them? The real issue here is that we the people made a choice and voted. That choice being overturned by some judge playing politics is a slap in the face to American voters. I will never vote again in this sham democracy. Our choices are an illusion and apparently our voice does not matter. This is not the America I was sold as a child. This so called democracy is just as much a fraud as Iran. What has our country come to? The marriage issue is one thing but our votes not mattering anymore is terrifying for anyone who believes We The People mean anything.

Aug 04, 2010 8:12pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.