Analysis: Why did 1.2 million U.S. workers leave job force?

WASHINGTON Fri Aug 6, 2010 2:38pm EDT

Case worker Jessica Yon discusses eligibility for unemployed people at a jobs center in San Francisco, California in this February 4, 2010 file photo. REUTERS/Robert Galbraith/Files

Case worker Jessica Yon discusses eligibility for unemployed people at a jobs center in San Francisco, California in this February 4, 2010 file photo.

Credit: Reuters/Robert Galbraith/Files

Related Video

Video

Job cuts rise, again

Fri, Aug 6 2010

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It's a mystery with many plausible solutions: Why did 1.2 million Americans drop out of the labor force over the past three months?

Had they stayed in the job market, the unemployment rate would have hit 10.2 percent in July, not the 9.5 percent that the Labor Department reported on Friday.

Depending on why they left, this could have positive or negative implications for the broader economy. Did they go back to school to develop more marketable skills, or was it merely the fleeting promise of temporary Census jobs lured workers back earlier this year?

"It's part of the ongoing syndrome of the longer the labor markets stays stuck in the bottom of a hole, the more people are discouraged," said Bill Cheney, chief economist at John Hancock Financial in Boston.

Friday's July employment report listed 1.19 million discouraged workers, compared with 796,000 a year earlier. The Labor Department defines discouraged workers as those who did not actively look for work in the prior four weeks because they could not find work, lacked training or faced discrimination.

Those discouraged workers are part of the reason why the percentage of people actively in the labor force has fallen so dramatically in the past three months.

The labor force participation rate dropped to 64.6 percent in July, matching the lowest level since 1985 and down 0.6 percentage point in the last three months alone.

That rate has been gradually declining since 2000, the height of the dot-com boom, when it peaked at 67.3 percent. Not surprisingly, the pace of decline picked up shortly after the September 2008 collapse of Lehman Brothers, which ushered in a darker phase of the recession and heavy job losses.

But by December 2009, the participation rate appeared to have bottomed out at 64.6 percent, and it rose for the first four months of this year before reversing in May. It has now fallen for three consecutive months.

"We just haven't got enough momentum there in the private jobs to convince people that things are turning around," said Nigel Gault, chief U.S. economist at IHS Global Insight in Lexington, Massachusetts.

TEENAGERS DROPPING OUT

Discouraged workers may become angry voters in November's congressional elections, which does not bode well for President Barack Obama's Democratic party, currently holding large majorities in both chambers of Congress.

Ironically, the dropouts are keeping the unemployment number below the psychologically significant 10 percent mark, so it could be a blessing in disguise.

The longer people stay out of the work force, the more their skills decay and the harder it becomes for them to find work again. That is why economists generally view declining labor force participation as a negative sign.

The timing of this recent decline is somewhat suspect. It coincided with the peak of the 2010 Census hiring, which suggests some workers jumped back into the labor pool in search of those temporary jobs.

It also could be that workers saw relatively strong economic growth in late 2009 and early 2010, but then gave up the search when the recovery appeared to be faltering in May.

A dig through the data shows men and women dropped out of the labor force at similar rates over the three-month period.

One group that stands out is teenagers. They left at about double the rate of the overall workforce, although they bucked the trend in July with a rising participation rate.

Just 34.6 percent of 16- to 19-year-olds were in the labor force in July. A decade ago, the participation rate for that age group was above 50 percent.

"By the end of that cycle in 2000, basically you just had to be breathing and you could get a job," John Hancock's Cheney said.

The drop in the teen labor force may be a bit of good news if it indicates young people choosing to attend college rather than going straight to work in the middle of a lousy labor market.

The Labor Department reported in April that 70.1 percent of high school graduates ages 16 to 24 were enrolled in college as of last October, the highest rate in the series that dates back to 1959.

Jack Ablin, chief investment officer at Harris Private Bank in Chicago, said if teens are indeed staying in school, that would be a hopeful sign for the economy because their job prospects and earnings power are likely to be higher.

The overall jobless rate for those with at least a bachelor's degree was 4.5 percent in July. For those with just a high school diploma, it was 10.1 percent.

Cheney said it would make sense for young people to choose college over work when there are not enough jobs to go around, and hopefully the labor market will look much healthier once they graduate.

"The cost of college is way lower if there's no way to make any money instead," he said.

(Editing by Neil Stempleman)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
yr2009 wrote:
Big mystery indeed.
Maybe they all inherited huge lumps of money, and retired happily ever after in new homes they bought?
Or maybe (just maybe) the census jobs were the last hope these people found to earn some money working, and now they’ve dropped out of the labor market for good, leaving the unemployment statistics look bad, but not as bad as reality is.

Aug 06, 2010 3:21pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
tk2 wrote:
The explanation is probably much simpler. Some call it “the Greek approach” to doing statistics. No polician wants to see a double-digit unemployment…

Aug 06, 2010 5:24pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
beancube2101 wrote:
Republicans don’t care how many homeless and prostitutes this recession is going to create. When angry unemployed see their kids go homeless or become some piss-off prostitutes, they are going to revenge. They know who had been forced to wash down social assistance bills and who had use filibuster any bill trying to gain political power and ignoring whatever consequences that this population is suffering beneath it. This filibuster monopoly politicians should paid for it. People will not isolate themselves, they’ll go to voting booths to revenge the filibuster Republicans.

Aug 06, 2010 7:13pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Pictures