Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Devastated by tornado

A huge tornado tears through the Oklahoma City suburb of Moore, killing dozens.  Slideshow 

Photo

Nuclear tsunami wall

Safety upgrades designed to prevent a repeat of the Fukushima disaster.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Accuser of ex-HP CEO Hurd steps forward

Related Topics

Hewlett-Packard Chief Executive Officer Mark Hurd smiles at a news conference announcing his appointment at HP headquarters in Palo Alto, California in this March 30, 2005 file photo. Hewlett-Packard Co Chief Executive Hurd resigned on August 6, 2010 following an investigation of sexual harassment, the world's top computer maker said. REUTERS/Lou Dematteis/Files

Hewlett-Packard Chief Executive Officer Mark Hurd smiles at a news conference announcing his appointment at HP headquarters in Palo Alto, California in this March 30, 2005 file photo. Hewlett-Packard Co Chief Executive Hurd resigned on August 6, 2010 following an investigation of sexual harassment, the world's top computer maker said.

Credit: Reuters/Lou Dematteis/Files

SAN FRANCISCO | Sun Aug 8, 2010 7:13pm EDT

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - The female contractor whose sexual harassment accusation against Mark Hurd led to his ouster as chief executive of Hewlett-Packard came forward on Sunday, saying she never intended for Hurd to lose his job.

The woman, Jodie Fisher, revealed her identity for the first time through a statement released by her attorney, Gloria Allred.

"I was surprised and saddened that Mark Hurd lost his job over this," she said. "That was never my intention."

Fisher is former salesperson and has appeared in movies and TV shows, most recently the show "Age of Love" on NBC.

HP stunned the business world on Friday by announcing Hurd's resignation, accusing him of falsifying expense reports to conceal a "close personal relationship" with a female contractor.

Fisher told HP's board in June that Hurd had sexually harassed her, but an investigation found no violation of the company's sexual harassment policy.

Fisher said Sunday she has resolved her claim against Hurd privately, but did not provide any further details.

"At HP, I was under contract to work at high-level customer and executive summit events held around the country and abroad," Fisher said. "I prepared for those events, worked very hard and enjoyed working for HP."

Fisher worked as a contractor for HP from late 2007 through 2009.

(Reporting by Gabriel Madway; Editing by Diane Craft)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
Companies presumably do not pay CEO’s a king’s ransom simply to parade a celebritized figurehead before investors, shareholders, and employees. If that were so then a moral misstep would require immediate dismissal. Whereas, if companies paid CEO’s a king’s ransom because some huge multiple of revenue created by that executive were at stake, they would do everything they could to avoid killing the proverbial goose that laid the golden egg! They would ask that valuable human asset in the CEO slot to apologize and try to make amends using their PR department. The truth is that CEO’s receive enough pay in several years to immediately retire wealthy, because they are celebritized figureheads who are paid a tiny fraction of the wholesale ripoff between what employees are actually worth (perhaps millions per head) and the “market rate pay” they are collectively coerced into accepting. The celebrity CEO gets paid a king’s ranson because that compensation is a fraction of what grossly underpaid overperforming employees are collectively paid. It’s like Why do they pay stars in Hollywood obscene sums of money? Naturally, it’s because corporations are expecting to earn thousands of times the stars’ compensation from public sales of products they manufacture. The question begs if robbing Peter (employees) to pay Paul (CEO’s and board members) is simply a short-term ripoff of shareholders for immediate gain?

Aug 08, 2010 9:23pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
IamArchangel wrote:
Imagine, in your job, that you get caught cooking the books while secretly dating a contract worker. (He resigned over the books, not the woman.) Would you get $12.2 million on your way out?

Aug 09, 2010 5:56am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.